World's most feared top 10 fighter jets.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
112,381
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 6, 2010

No description available.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,121)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • no su-30 mk? no su-35 bm? no su-35s? bs lame

  • SU-30MKI has thrust/weight ration of 1.03 and not 0.87.

  • @siremitreppots F-22 hasn't seen combat because they're hasnt been any combat, not since the conflict with Libya at least. You know why they pulled the F-117 out of service? Because the F-22 does the job better. Most of the flukes that have been associated with the F-22 , such as rain damaging, were complete myths and have been disproven, and it's not a "craptor" by any means. I don't anything about the B-2 however.

  • @Direwolf56 the russian jets are excellent. They have been for 30 years. Where the russian jets EXCEL is in missile evasion AFTER the missile has been fired. This is totally OVERLOOKED by mainstream and so called in the know media. The F-22 has not seen combat to date for ONE REASON. It has hiccups up the ass. Figure out why the F-117 if so succesful is out of service? Why did they pull the b-2 out of active service after it was in service? Best bomber and fighter jet in the world?.

  • @egorikem So if the F-22 is the best fighter in the world, and it's a peice of shat, then what does it make that Russian garbage?

  • f22 is pice of shat...

  • @domycrodubrava

    If u buy a Russian Su-30, it'll be much inferior to the Su-30MKI which originates from Russia/India....

    Indians have heavily contributed in the Avionics department where they thought they would do a better job than the Russians..

    Also Su-30MKI is produced by India, with Russian liscence offcourse..

  • @macd007 lol nice joke

  • @macd007 well I never heard that mirage 2000 was beaten by Harrier, more over the manipulability and propulsion the radar of the mirage 2000 is far better can you proove it ?

    Also the Rafale is not Mirage 2000. Look at the libyan conflict, what the Ef2000 did ? look at the Rafale performances and versatility in Libyan conflict and the fights between both (mainly UAE), Rafale is better, if you want poofs I can give you some.

  • @titiboo90 these aircraft are rarely tested against each other in real combat situations.

    Anyone claiming ones superiority over another in two aircraft of similar technological age are just guessing.

    In the Mirages case however, they fought against the British equivalent. The Harrier.

    And it failed terribly.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more