Onision's Dubious Sources

Youtube user Onision, a militant vegetarian and power-hungry cult leader bent on galactic domination, recently posted a video called "Human = Herbivore" where he claims that (surprise) humans are only supposed to eat vegetables. The source for this claim is a bit flimsy, methinks.

Youtube user antybu86, who has also been targeted by Onision's false DMCA flagging, posted a rebuttal to this video.

--------------------------------------------------
Onision's video "Human = Herbivore":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOEpxeqIKA8

antybu86's rebuttal:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xw5FdiC774

Quackwatch:
http://www.quackwatch.com/

Quackwatch's page on "Natural Hygiene":
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/natural_hygiene.html

Quackwatch's page on "Fit for life":
http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/fitforlife.html

The (ahem..) National Health Association homepage:
http://www.healthscience.org/ (redirected from anhs.org)

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Onision
• bullshit
• sources
• natural
• hygiene
• antybu86

[kilkolio]

lol that shit looked like a cookbook

[easuter]

@kilkolio, you're not far from the truth. It contained vegetarian recipes, anecdotes and small articles bitching about "big pharma".

No research though.

[stephjuhler999]

Of course you guys will say all this stuff is "quackery" just so you can justify your meat-eating lifestyles.

[easuter]

Unless you can provide evidence that corroborates the food mixing "theory" presented in "Fit for life", then it will remain in the domain of quackery since it is pure speculation.

Quackwatch's article even presents reasons why the Fit for Life "theory" has no basis to it, even though the burden of proof didn't rest on them.

It's unfortunate that the Fit for Life scammers decided to mix in vegetarianism...Onision should really chose his source better.

[stephjuhler999]

Mixing carbohydrates with meat makes you fat? That can easily be proved by reading any book on nutrition. Why should you trust Quackwatch any more than Fit For Life? Maybe they have their own ulterior motives. Who's to say that Quackwatch is any more correct than Fit for Life?

[easuter]

Quackwatch's article writers are usually medical and nutritional professionals, in the proper sense of the word since they actually have a real formal education.

I just looked through the Fit for Life magazines, and although they are titled "Health Science", there is nothing scientific in them: no research papers and no data or experimental protocols accompanying the claims they make.

And regarding your claim that mixing meat and starch makes you fat: provide peer reviewed sources please.

[Gindelbi]

It's true, kangarooelaine. We can choose not to eat animals. I choose to eat animals and when I eventually go to hell as Onision says, I'll then have even more fire to grill all that delicious meat! See, we can agree and get along! =)

[antybu86]

Thank you very much for this video. I think I will add an annotation on mine linking to this.

[kilkolio]

@stephjuhler999

the thing is there onision had not brought any evidence other than from a magazine, news article he got

journalists always have their newsletter bias in their best interest and wont give out proper evidence they like to make up things that will sound in favor for the parties they belong in, check fox news which makes their motives blatantly obvious

[kilkolio]

@stephjuhler999

looks like someone cant bear the truth about her hero

[kilkolio]

galactic domination? this guy is the reason aliens didnt contact us yet cuz there's no intelligent life on earth to be reported

[moonlightkisu]

@stephjuhler999 lol. I just had a chicken sandwich. It was delicious.

[3642130]

i liked quackwatch until they tried to use "catholic" science to disprove reiki-if 1 is skeptical of energy healing, 1 certainly would not defend their position with the kings of quackery-christianity-you know-insestial beginnings of humans,talking snakes and burning bushes, don't 4get the "miracles"! members of organized religion have no place in rational skepticism!

[threadysparrow]

yeah steph that sounds sane. perfectly normal and perfectly logical response. no psychopathologies in your life at all i would say. perfectly healthy

[trulyheaven777]

I'm fully aware and in agreement that man is an omnivore, I just hate ever seeing QW used as a reference for anything. I'd use articles they list that are not authored by the members instead. Just a suggestion to boost credibility.