@justincgs It's also worth noting that it's nuclear capable. This spec means a hell of a lot more than simply dropping/launching nuclear ordinance. It means the aircraft has been hardened for EMP etc. The "fly by wire" system is actually fiber optic based to give it these specs.
@chenoir and that's not even with AESA radar! One can only imagine the performance once the avionics etc are upgraded to F4/F5. Also the 110KN engines will bring it into a league that truly competes with Typhoon for air superiority and interceptor duties!
@ContreJours Les G affichés sont ceux qui s'exercent du haut vers le bas pour des raisons physiologiques, aérodynamique et structurelle (+ en virage, - en piqué). En appontant, le/la pilote subit des G vers l'avant à cause du freinage. Or, les G dans cet axe ne sont indiqués. En fait ça sert à rien d'inonder le pilote d'info : l'angle d'attaque α , la vitesse ici (ici 131 kts en approche), l’altitude et les G (ds le sens haut vers bas) suffisent à maîtriser l'avion.
@chenoir You question my literacy, with that spelling? I think you'll find that most modern fighters can launch X weapons in one pass, but I think the whole concept of 'engaging' targets simultaneously is a little bit futile, for the sake of a few seconds there is absolutely no advantage over attacking targets sequentially. Anyhow, if the Rafale can do simultaneous engagements, I think that the F-35 probably can too.
@justincgs Whatever fella, you've obviously got it all worked out.
FlyboyHelosim 4 days ago
@FlyboyHelosim absolute utter BULLSHIT! For CAS it's completely USELESS!
justincgs 5 days ago
@justincgs It's also worth noting that it's nuclear capable. This spec means a hell of a lot more than simply dropping/launching nuclear ordinance. It means the aircraft has been hardened for EMP etc. The "fly by wire" system is actually fiber optic based to give it these specs.
justincgs 5 days ago
@chenoir and that's not even with AESA radar! One can only imagine the performance once the avionics etc are upgraded to F4/F5. Also the 110KN engines will bring it into a league that truly competes with Typhoon for air superiority and interceptor duties!
justincgs 5 days ago
@kirkjamestkirk Merci pour l'explication, c'est clair maintenant ;)
ContreJours 6 days ago
@ContreJours Les G affichés sont ceux qui s'exercent du haut vers le bas pour des raisons physiologiques, aérodynamique et structurelle (+ en virage, - en piqué). En appontant, le/la pilote subit des G vers l'avant à cause du freinage. Or, les G dans cet axe ne sont indiqués. En fait ça sert à rien d'inonder le pilote d'info : l'angle d'attaque α , la vitesse ici (ici 131 kts en approche), l’altitude et les G (ds le sens haut vers bas) suffisent à maîtriser l'avion.
kirkjamestkirk 6 days ago
@dima78350 Un freinage brusque c'est une forte décélération, donc le pilote devrait tout de même subir plusieurs G.
ContreJours 1 week ago
@ContreJours Pourquoi?Ils ne font pas de figures aériennes, ca freine juste brusquement!
dima78350 1 week ago
Je croyais que les pilotes encaissaient plus de G à l'appontage.
ContreJours 1 week ago
@chenoir You question my literacy, with that spelling? I think you'll find that most modern fighters can launch X weapons in one pass, but I think the whole concept of 'engaging' targets simultaneously is a little bit futile, for the sake of a few seconds there is absolutely no advantage over attacking targets sequentially. Anyhow, if the Rafale can do simultaneous engagements, I think that the F-35 probably can too.
FlyboyHelosim 2 weeks ago