Girl argues that a baby is not a person, but rather is a "cancer"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,115
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 8, 2008

An argument outside of Washington University on the day of the VP debate '08 between a pro-life advocate and a pro-choice young woman regarding when a baby becomes a person and should thus be afforded to governmental protections typically given to a person.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (332)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @payasoinfeliz yes China has laws forcing abortion, you are really bad LOL. How can u say that? Ok the reason why pro-choice people dont use fetuses is because murderers have morals too, they kill human babies but they will never use them as soap or food.

  • @trifulquita15 given their scarcity in relation to other sources, thered have to be something very special about them for anything like that to catch on. maybe if fetus soap revolutionized anti-aging products... i could see that. its not easy to just use something for the sake of using it--it takes resources, and demand/revenue to justify those resources. if it were profitable, have at it. china reportedly sells supplements made of fetuses.

  • @payasoinfeliz fetuses have fat, society could use their bodies to make soap. Millions of fetuses are dumped into containers, a sincere pro-choice could say its a waste of resources, so why pro-choice activists dont want to use fetuses for industrial purposes?

  • @trifulquita15 do you know why most species are averse to consuming their own kind? because the more closely related to someone you are, the more susceptible you are to contracting diseases from them. eating embryos would have to be highly regulated to be safe. it wouldnt be worth it. doubt they even taste good. and youd need a bunch of em--theyre so tiny.

  • A human being is the summation of their beliefs. Bible is what it claims to be.The fool has said in her heart that there is no God. Creation is proof of God's existence. All things were by Him and for Him and without Him nothing was made that is made. A Godless heathen who is even .000000001% unsure should error on the side of caution and give it up for adoption......but they don't think/pray.Jesus is sad and devil is pleased with the atheist.

  • @trifulquita15 Good point.

  • @trifulquita15 . So you honestly think an embryo is just as much a human beeing as I am? Dude you must be trolling?

  • @petelovesrat ok, if embryos are not human beings, then you think we should use embryos as food?? i mean people could eat embryos as eggs. we should send embryos as food to Africa? LOL again who is the stupid

  • @trifulquita15 A collection of cells is not a human beeing. Do you regard a pastry dish with 10000 embryos as 10000 human beeings? Stop listening to you pastor for once and think for yourself... Ohh, and its still you that is the stupid one.

  • @petelovesrat Liberals call christians homophobics, but liberals are pro-choice they kill thousands of gays n lesbians inside the womb. Now who is the stupid

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more