agreed. The only thing I liked about old pride rules was the round set up. The 10 minute first round was a good idea. Oh, and the soccer kicks stomps and knees to the head. ::thumbs up::
I think that the ring is biased to strikers, and creates stand ups. 90% of new fans are like, "WTF is going on?" when they watch a ring match and the stand up and move occurs. This never occurs with a cage.
Trapped against the cage? lol, how about trapped in a corner? That's way way worst than traped against the cage. who is dumb enough to give this guy thumbs up votes? Dumbass org bashers.
it has to be also a show man ...IN a perfect world then there would be then no time matches so bjj guys can get their sub done ..BUT NO ..the ring helps people to watch better, fight better instead of run away...
PS...only Americans like shapes with 8 sides? All non-Americans prefer squares? What does nationality have to do with this again? Yeah....
Not to mention, I never said anything about the UFC or any other org, just that the ring is not good for MMA. Ring is good for boxing and other standup only sports.
The ring presents unnecessary stops in the action, provides a corner for strikers like cro cop to corner someone and look better than they really are. The octagon corners give less advantage to certain styles. You are probably one of the fail guys that thinks the yellow cards were good. Anything that stops the fight from being legit (stand ups, stopping due to the ring being a bad venue, telling a fighter their strat is too "boring" to be used)are disruptive to the sport. Sport > show.
in this case the ref is, ...but the ring is the real thing ...the octagon is good but is too big so you can run like a coward..just like u stupid motherfucker...of course you are from USA ajjjajjaajja
mmm ..very true
uncabro 3 years ago
agreed. The only thing I liked about old pride rules was the round set up. The 10 minute first round was a good idea. Oh, and the soccer kicks stomps and knees to the head. ::thumbs up::
I think that the ring is biased to strikers, and creates stand ups. 90% of new fans are like, "WTF is going on?" when they watch a ring match and the stand up and move occurs. This never occurs with a cage.
kalikeros 3 years ago
maybe ...but not cuz someone fights on the ground he needs a cage and plenty of space ...NO ....
uncabro 3 years ago
Trapped against the cage? lol, how about trapped in a corner? That's way way worst than traped against the cage. who is dumb enough to give this guy thumbs up votes? Dumbass org bashers.
kalikeros 3 years ago
it has to be also a show man ...IN a perfect world then there would be then no time matches so bjj guys can get their sub done ..BUT NO ..the ring helps people to watch better, fight better instead of run away...
uncabro 3 years ago
PS...only Americans like shapes with 8 sides? All non-Americans prefer squares? What does nationality have to do with this again? Yeah....
Not to mention, I never said anything about the UFC or any other org, just that the ring is not good for MMA. Ring is good for boxing and other standup only sports.
kalikeros 3 years ago
The ring presents unnecessary stops in the action, provides a corner for strikers like cro cop to corner someone and look better than they really are. The octagon corners give less advantage to certain styles. You are probably one of the fail guys that thinks the yellow cards were good. Anything that stops the fight from being legit (stand ups, stopping due to the ring being a bad venue, telling a fighter their strat is too "boring" to be used)are disruptive to the sport. Sport > show.
kalikeros 3 years ago
in this case the ref is, ...but the ring is the real thing ...the octagon is good but is too big so you can run like a coward..just like u stupid motherfucker...of course you are from USA ajjjajjaajja
cuernavaca 3 years ago
My comment is ridiculous? This display of the worthlessness of the ring in MMA is ridiculous.
kalikeros 3 years ago
RIDICULOUS COMMENT....
uncabro 3 years ago