"Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."

The structural strength of WTC 1+2 comes from the massive inner core columns, which were not damaged enough to lead to collapse. The towers were designed to withstand multiple jet impacts.

your a moron, yea the temperatures may have been exceeded but try them getting hit by a plane aswell

Buildings have burned much hotter and for far longer than WTC7 and they didn't collapse. The physics don't lie, this was a controlled demolition.

hahahahahahahahaha

Even if the debris damaged WTC 7 it's impossible it will fall straight down just like that.

Tony: maybe it was inevitable that WTC7 would collapse. I will agree with you on that. HOWEVER, you must admit that WTC7 did not have to collapse as it did: at nearly the same instant and at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds or 25 meters. I defy you to find a building anything like WTC7 that collapsed in anything like the manner of WTC7. 25 meters of free fall means 25 meters of vertical support suddenly gone. Not weakened by fire: GONE! And from all over the base of the building.

They should have at least vacuumed the carpets first - yuck!

Note the ticker at 0:38 which reads,

'Poll: half of US blames Bush admin for 9/11.'

Yeah, the undeluded half.

Can ANYONE tell me why my search bar no longer works on you tube?It works everywhere else on the web. You Tube does not want to be contacted.

You dont know what your talking about! As a Civil & Structural Engineer steel buildings to NOT come down like these three WITHOUT controlled Dems. Its IMPOSSIBLE!!! 911 was done by terrorists, I AGREE!! Unforunately the all worked at the Whitehouse!!

Get ready for the NWO people!