"Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."

http://www.myspace.com/fightnwo

Firemen evacuated the area as they prepared for the collapse of Building Seven. "We heard a Mayday for everybody to get out of the building [140 West] -- no, I'm sorry, an urgent, three urgents, and we came out of the building [before 4 p.m.]. ... We were then positioned on Vesey Street between North End and the West Side Highway because there was an imminent collapse on 7 World Trade, and it did collapse." [Brian Fitzpatrick, Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.)]


"It's blowin' boy." ... "Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon." ... "The building is about to blow up, move it back." ... "Here we are walking back. There's a building, about to blow up..."

When buildings such as WTC 7 are demolished the collapse is initiated by an explosion in the central area of the basement. This causes the building to collapse in on itself and minimizes damage to surrounding structures

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• Truth
• Demolition
• WTC7
• Building
• Seven
• Ground
• Zero
• infowars
• Alex
• Jones
• False
• Flag
• Mainstream
• Media
• Lies
• explosives

[bagintree]

This is supposed to be evidence of a demolition of WTC 7? OMG, how stupid. If those guys are firefighters, then if they're being literal about the building blowing up, that means they were part of the inside job. They lost a bunch of their own guys that day but they're part of the plot?

Truthers are idiots.

[joecanukk]

Anyone who believes the official NIST report of ONE column ( #78 I believe) to be the main cause of the symmetrical near free fall collapse of building 7 is the conspiracy nut. WAKE UP ! Critical thinking is lost for these Flag Suckers.

[ThePassiveFist]

@HelFKiernan

Evidence linking the hijackers to the crime?

the FBI themselves said that they had NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE linking Osama Bin laden to the attacks.

and videos are easy to fake. think about it - you can go to the movies for 2 hours and walk out not being able to tell what parts were real and what was CGI.

and just because something is improbable, does not make it impossible.

[ThePassiveFist]

@HelFKiernan

I have my suspicions about the phonecalls. I've had my cellphone on during flights, and as soon as you reach any appreciable speed and height, the coverage just goes. i also become highly suspicious when one of the phonecalls went like this: “Mom? This is Mark Bingham.” ... “You believe me, don’t you?"

who identifies themselves to their own mom by their full name?

your claim that someone would say their relatives were in on it is a strawman.

[ThePassiveFist]

@HelFKiernan

you throw up so many strawman arguments it's difficult to know where to start - which is entirely what you're aiming for.

let's get one thing straight: I don't think the firefighters were in on it - they were heroes. i think it likely that the people you see on this vid were either told by someone in command that it weas coming down, or they werren't firefighters at all - rather a demolitions crew that WERE in on it.

[HelFKiernan]

@ThePassiveFist So do you affirm that you think that the firefighters on the ground were in on the plot to kill all these people? Do you also believe that all the phone calls from the people on flight 93 were faked, & all their relatives are in on in? Do you think all the evidence linking the hijackers to the crime, including video is fake? That the previous plot by the same group, & their subsequent admissions, are red herrings? & no one got caught? Seems rather improbable...

[HelFKiernan]

@ThePassiveFist (con't). Even if you prove that it was a controlled demolition, you still have to prove that the explosion was carried out by whoever you think did it- and there are many claims, ranging from secret alien overlords to the Bush Adminstration. Do you have any such evidence, ie paperwork/recording that links a specific person to this crime?

[HelFKiernan]

@ThePassiveFist No, no, no, you misunderstand me. Of course there are all kinds of loud sounds happening all around for various reasons, but when you demo a large building there is a very specific, loud "boom" that you always here when explosives go off, which I have yet to see in any video. I have no preconceived belief about how any event happens, I rely on evidence & amend view as needed. If you have evidence of controlled demo, please present it.

[ThePassiveFist]

@HelFKiernan

explosions were heard by dozens, or hundreds of eyewitnesses, and caught on tape - you just haven't looked, or dismissed them because they don't fit in with your preconcieved ideas of what happened.

Same goes for the evidence for controlled demolition. there's evidence, you're just choosing to dismiss it.

NIST would not find something they did not look for.

You've obviously not bothered to research any of your claims, so this conversation is at an end until you do.

[HelFKiernan]

@ThePassiveFist (con't) It makes far more sense that a firefighter would be able to predict what may happen based on experience than that he was an evil secret agent. Moreover, no evidence indicating a controlled demo (which leaves many) was found, not to mention that demos "go boom" & this doesn't. No one has brought forth any evidence linking the destruction of the towers to anyone either in our actual government or secret reptilian government.

[ThePassiveFist]

@HelFKiernan

so you're quite happy to believe that firefighters can accurately predict, to within a few minutes, when a steel-framed building that's on fire will collapse? what kind of chaos theory physicist would you have to be to be able to predict with that kind of accuracy?