Ruby on Rails vs .NET - Commercial #9 of 9
Top Comments
All Comments (165)
-
-
i'm a cakephp programmer and dont give a damn about the video's content, just find them funny... u ppl should stop taking it so seriously. we're all making money out of our favorite framework/language... (if you're not, then you should be angry)
-
Some of your guys have to lighten up. They're pretty funny videos lol.
-
By the way I like Ruby/RoR, but this is not a good comparison. I do agree the M$ is trying to copy or simulate things that dynamic languages are doing. Especially in C# 4.0.
-
dynamic typing would mean that the type is chosen dynamically(e.g. at runtime). Which is pointless in any language even ruby. var a = 5; would be type inference. The type is chosen at compile time. Ruby on the other hand, correct me if I'm wrong, does not type variables.In the same function you can have:
a = "5"
puts a
a = 5
puts a
a = [5, 5, 5]
puts a
Which means that a points to three different types depending at point of access. This is wouldn't be type inference or dynamic typing.
-
Why does everyone take these videos so damn serious?
-
0/10
-
.net/c# is fucking lovely.
-
This debate is rather heated, I don't think you understand the seriousness of the topic at hand. This is life of death shit.
-
These guys don't know what their talking about.
"var a = 5;" in c# is not dynamic typing. It is called Type Inference.
Dynamic is done differently. You're just making your self a fool trolling the internet.
Congratulations, you just made total asses of yourselves in front of the entire internet.
inopiaaardbei 1 year ago 93
Wow, this series somehow managed to piss off ALL the programmers out there...
Zotov13 10 months ago 46