Norman Finkelstein Speaks in Edmonton

Dr. Norman Finkelstein speaking at the University of Alberta on January 22, 2009. His talk dealt with Israel's responsibility in the situation in Gaza and the history of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Co-sponsored by the Palestine Solidarity Network, Canada Palestine Cultural Organization, Alberta Federation of Labour, U of A Muslim Students' Association, Canadian Arab News, and U of A Department of Political Science.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• norman
• finkelstein
• edmonton
• university
• alberta
• gaza
• israel
• palestine
• solidarity
• network

[takethetimetoday]

@Wassouf10 nice post

[Wassouf10]

People dont understand that people like this man N.Finkelstein will go to history as one of the few people (credit to them all you all should know which people) that stood up and defended this bizaree "conflict" which it really isnt. It is a colonial project, a zionist project about terrorizing and ethnically cleanse another people. Its happening in front of our eyes and the level of lies you face when you study this is scary, how can people defend Israel, seriously? This is a holocaust in work.

[rms16006]

@freenational because Isreal the ZIONIST "false or fake Jews" OWN america, decide who the presidents will be ..it goes further then just us helping Isreal its very deep and semi complicated.

[ahmed337799]

I love you mr Finkelstein.

[Dr1Canuckchuck]

@emotionalinvalid Ya, I meant he played his part beautifully from the perspective of the people desiring a United Nations - or One World Government. The apparatus is now established for a One World Governing body, if Hitler hadn't done what he did there would still be no United Nations and the apparatus for a One World Government would not have been established. So, from the perspective of the Marxist One World Government ideologues he played his part and did so beautifully, that was his purpose

[emotionalinvalid]

@Dr1Canuckchuck Hitler played his part beautifully?! At the cost of tens of millions of lives! the real problem was the neutrality act in the US that prevented the production and sale of arms to any nations, not the least of which those in Europe. We could have got out of the depression and prevented at least the european theater of ww2, by arming the Poles, French, UK, et al. Don't laugh at the Poles. They beat the red army in 1922. Even in thier complacency and old arms gave nazi's fight.

[Redcarpet01]

@Dr1Canuckchuck He meant a German-led Europe, yes. And no, he didn't beleive in international institutions.

[Dr1Canuckchuck]

@Redcarpet01 Do you really believe that Hitler would have stopped at Germany? He didn't call what he was doing a "German World Order", he called it a "New World Order", just like all the rest are doing today. He just played his part in establishing an apparent need/desire for a United Nations - the future One World Government. The first attempt at a UN (after WW1) failed - Hitler finally convinced the nations of the world that a UN was necessary to maintain peace. He played his part beautifully.

[Redcarpet01]

@Dr1Canuckchuck In regards to a GERMAN world order, yes.

[Dr1Canuckchuck]

@freenational I see what you're saying, but America and Israel are driving toward the same goal - Global Zionism. They are in league with one another and always have been right from Israel's creation in 1948. Kissinger, both G. Bush boys, Clinton, Brzezinski, Obama, etc have all sung the praises of a New World Order in countless speeches over the past 20 years. What do people think they're really talking about? Do they forget Hitler used the very same term?