Peer-Reviewed Intelligent Design Article

Stephen Meyer corrects the misinformation of Eugenie Scott who claims there are no peer-reviewed ID artciles. He points out there are many, including one he wrote himself.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• science
• evolution
• intelligent
• design

[TheThomaswastaken]

Her response was, '...but Stephen, there was nothing about I.D. in your paper. Your paper was an attack on evolution...'

For those who car to know the truth.

[vatoencabronado]

Peer reviewed by who? The article that was written was not peer reviewed. The process was hijacked by the editor in question, who published it WITHOUT peer review. He subsequently lost his post for his lack of professionalism in this and other areas. I'm pretty sure it's the same guy featured in the Visine/Ferris Bueller guy's piece of ID entertainment.

[TChapman500]

@thejewishagnostic First off, you are making a faulty appeal to authority/majority. The majority has been wrong before. Secondly, those "scientific" organizations have been shown to be lying. Reusing their statements after you've been informed of their lies means that you are lying as well. Thirdly, these organizations will support evolution no matter where the evidence leads. I have no intention of talking to a liar.

[TChapman500]

@thejewishagnostic You are lying.

(1) The paper is peer reviewed. Censorship demanded that it be retracted and scripted a trial to ensure it's retraction (violation of Freedom of Press in 1st Amendment).

(2) The paper does talk about ID (even endorsing it) and DOES NOT attack any of the evolutionary theories. It simply uses facts to conclude that Intelligent Design is the most plausible explanation.

(3) Many scientists in the scientific community accept ID over evolution.

[TChapman500]

The article was peer-reviewed! This video [/watch?v=nnj_OtkUK3I] has a link to that article as well as other peer-reviewed article.

[skywize]

I love the idea of trying to get creationism peer reviewed. I'd like to submit my hypothesis on how leprechauns run the world.... lol. It's too stupid to take seriously.

[mikeeboy1000]

Another liar for the lake of fire!

[Sinnessa]

Such a bizarre video. To cut off the important part and to selectively only show this small segment, means you must *know* you're wrong. There must have been a point before you posted this video where you intentionally decided not to post the part that discredits your point.

[FinallyTheNight]

Evolutionism's corporator Eugenia Scott is a lady in the same vein that the public facility with toilets for women sports the plastic placard: LADIES.

[Gnomefro]

@ChristianMission Having passed peer review gives you more credibility than not, but if someone dissects your article and find it doesn't hold up to any kind of scientific standard for quality work. Guess what. That reflects badly on the reviewers in addition to the clown being debunked and it could cause the reviewers to get removed from their positions as well. The scientific process reacts to errors by dealing honestly with them, not by declaring humanity's best effort to be useless.

[Gnomefro]

@ChristianMission "Meyer's article is only "unscientific" and badly written because you disagree with its content and conclusion"

You seem to think that there are no criteria by which one could dismiss articles as unscientific. Which is simply amusing

"urther, by saying so, you're discrediting the peer review process as a while, thus making the process irrelevant"

Peer review is *a* safeguard that weeds out a lot of idiocy. It is not a perfect mechanism though and everyone knows it.

[Gnomefro]

@MrJaredJammer It would be something else if the "evolution skeptics" had any actual evidence for their insane ramblings, as opposed to a presupposition that Darwinian natural selection must be wrong because certain bronze age myths say otherwise and endless ramblings about profoundly unscientific concepts like "irreducible complexity". As it is, they're just intellectual vandals that are rightly kept away from positions where they get government funding, much like flat earthers are.