Composition of the United States Senate 1914-2004
Uploader Comments (tiercel76)
All Comments (23)
-
DON'T READ THIS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS YOU WILL BE KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DON'T POST THIS TO AT LEAST THREE VIDEOS OR YOU WILL DIE WITHIN TWO DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READING THIS DON'T STOP THIS IS SO SCARY PUT THIS ON AT LEAST FIVE VIDEO IN 143 MINUTES WHEN YOUR DONE PRESS F6 AND YOU LOVER NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN THE BIG LETTER THIS IS SO SCARY
-
IT would be cool if you updated this!
-
Would you consider updating this through 2008?
-
I don't think this is really accurate. I say this because it shows California changing color in 1990 but if I look back at it right, California didn't have a Senate race then.
-
yes like 12 times
-
your right, i was a little off. My point was it is very Niaeve to want to live in the past.
Nice work -- but it's almost meaningless, since the party lables changed so much.
Democrats in the South were fiercely anti civil rights, for example, and many Democrat changed to GOP after Civil Rights Act of 64.
Still, a lot of people are too stupid to realize party labels have been all over the place, rendering them meaningless in many respects.
12FlyMe 2 years ago
It's meaningless... but it's not meaningless?
Anyway... thanks for the comment.
tiercel76 2 years ago
Nah... sorry I like the composition of the senate in 2004 better and would prefer to remember it that way. ; ) Thanks for viewing it
tiercel76 3 years ago