Garbage gasification

Thermal Oxidation

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• TRash

[flaimdancer]

this is for alot of whoever. i posted a video of my 500 dollar homemade stove that beats hands down any thing out there. after it is going, up to temperture. i wood make a wager that it has probably less then half a gram per hour. and that it hammers dioxins, all that malarky out of the flue stream. you can put your hand over the flue opening ten feet up from the stove. I PUT A BRIDGESTONE TIRE FOOT SQUARE, AND TWO AND A HALF DOZEN EGGS IN AND NO SMOKE. PERIOD "flaimdancer" youtube

[AlAnsikk]

roads? where we're going we don't need "roads!"

[heald269]

Your ignorance is amazingly evident. You will continue as a non viable solution using a cumbrsome slow process from a closed minded morons defensive stance. 4 TPD that's it! One truck load per day now that's a slow process. Could have easily had your system processing 250 TPD with only a few changes. What an IDIOT! Your that stupid to be defensive over those comments? Wow! What a Moron. How dumb can you be. I obviously have experience with Pyrolysis, over 25 years. You Loose!

[heald269]

Your ignorance is amazingly evident. You will continue as a non viable solution using a cumbrsome slow process from a closed minded morons defensive stance. What an IDIOT! I tried.

[JasonThePure]

@heald269 You've got a point, but you're also a tremendous douchebag. There's no need to wave your e-peen in Youtube comments of all things.

[heald269]

You think your leading edge. I can prove your process is rudementary at best. efficency level on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the best. You get a 3 in efficiency. pyrolysis or destructive distillation of MSW must be at about 50% of materials with the waste in a pile. I can show you how to achieve Continual feed and flow 24/7, with a 90% reduction in weight and 70% reduction in volume with the by-product produced gas. 10 minutes you will be convinced your process is rudementary at best.

[heald269]

System would be far more efficient if it was not batch fed. Efficiency was not taken into consideration when this process was designed. dumping the waste in a pit and heatng the waste using external gasses on a batch by batch basis just about eliminates posssiblity it will ever be self sustaining. Moisture levels in the MSW negatively affects the BTU level BTU levels of the produced gas. System would be far more efficient if waste was dried using waste heat. Impossible using a batch fed design.

[kingkong60608]

I'm involving some thing like your, please use this e-mail to keep for communication with your improvements. Thanks

[boogerhead0]

Oh, as to continuous, some propose a heated jacket screw, which forms its own sealing plug on the cooler, hopper end.

..and then there's several patents on the fluidized bed continuous processes.

[boogerhead0]

In the system you operated, where was the coke and sludge removed?