FYROM's ethnicity (Bulgarians not Macedonians)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
486 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Sep 3, 2011

Another hard evidence that shatters FYROM's preudomacedonian propaganda. Since they acknowledge the Czar Samuil as their ancestor and since Samuil was a Bulgarian then how can the FYROMians not be Bulgarians? The facts are clear and undeniable about Samuil's Bulgarian nationality, no matter how hard the FYROMians try to distort this fact as well. The Byzantine emperor when he annihilated Samuil's army got the nickname "BULGAR SLAYER" not "Macedonian slayer" simply because the Byzantines knew that Samuil and his people were Bulgarians.



ΕΛΛΑΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΑ ΒΥΖΑΝΤΙΟ ΕΛΛΗΝΑΣ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΑΣ ΜΑΚΕΔΩΝ ΒΟΥΛΓΑΡΙΑ ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΦΙΛΙΠΠΟΣ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΙΟΣ ΒΟΥΛΓΑΡΟΚΤΟΝΟΣ ΣΑΜΟΥΗΛ HELLAS GREECE MAKEDONIA MACEDONIA MACEDOINE MAZEDONIEN BYZANTIUM BYZANTINE EMPIRE BULGARIA VASILIOS BASIL BULGAR SLAYER SAMUIL SAMUEL ALEXANDER DER GROSSE MAKEDON MACEDON MEGAS ALEXANDROS THE GREAT PHILIPPOS PHILIP FILIPPOS GREEK BYZANTINE MAKEDONIJA FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SPARTANsenator8)

  • By the way, if you want to make a more funier movie, try it with the Bulgarian rulers Presian the First and Presian the Second. Presian the First was the ruler who conquered the region of Macedonia and is considered in FYROM also as an Bulgarian ruler. Presian the Second suprisingly becomes an "ethnic Macedonian", altough FYROM could not explain why he is the SECOND (and who was the First "Macedonian ruler") and why he named himself after a Bulgarian ruler who actualy conquered this region.

  • @samuil323232

    FYROMians are a joke, they try to steal historical figures from Greece and Bulgaria and they cannot even explain the contradictions that their fairy tales entail. They don't even agree with each other in what to say. They are clowns! They have even put an ancient tablet outside their parliament and the writings are in Greek and of course they cannot read what it says!

  • They say that Czar Samuil is their ancestor because the capital of his empire was at Ohrid, near Skopje, but he was bulgarian, he had nothing to do with them. It is only a fake yugoslav theory, now rejected by the modern historians who found out the truth!

  • @rockfellia

    These imposters use Samuil to present a false theory that they existed at that time and hide the truth that they are mere products of the 20th century communist plans to create a fake nation.

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @rockfellia Not only this, the father of Samuil was Komitopul (governour) of one of the most important regions of Bulgaria Serdika (Sofia) and the most important fortress of Bulgaria, Vidin. The Bulgarian Tsar Petar I anounced him to this position. By the way therefrom derives the name of the dinasty Komitopuli. When East Bulgaria was conquered by Basil II, Samuil invited the patriarch of Tarnovo to Ohrid, the most vivid symbol of the Bulgarian nationhood.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more