Franz Liszt Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 - Josef Bulva
Uploader Comments (oHsNaP1337)
Top Comments
-
Thumbs up if you brought yourself here. zzz
-
I would say this is my favorite interpretation.
Video Responses
All Comments (377)
-
@oHsNaP1337 Who gives a f*ck?
-
this literally makes me tear up... To think that such a piece can have so much passion put into it and so much creativity.. It just goes to show why the human race is the most superior in the world...
-
@oHsNaP1337 How's that definition supposed to fit for Post-Rock bands?
-
god damn i love this. this playing alone is enough to make this art real.
-
The reason that made me start playing piano was to play the songs in my own favourite style, but this interpretation doesnt need any change at all!
-
shut up and listen!
-
@oHsNaP1337 thats factually incorrect, a song can be just instrumentals. replacing the singing of a voice (an instrument) with a man made instrument..
-
True, but Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody # 2 is really popular, it's been in a lot of cartoons. I hummed the famous line of the Friska to my friends, and all of them have heard it before, whereas when I hummed some Mozart pieces that have been on media, they've never heard it. :P
-
Well technically it stil could be called a song because by your definition, it does a contain a 'voice'. The piano is very much a voice of its own.
-
not a song. but it is an absolutely magnificent piece of music.
@relbl well la de da i think it can still be called a song. But thanks for the other opptions
sugahmama1234 3 weeks ago
@sugahmama1234 ...This is NOT a "song" and should not be called one, this is called a "piano piece". In order for something to be considered a "song", it must have/consist of vocals and/or lyrics, this piece has neither.
oHsNaP1337 3 weeks ago 3