Photographs, movies and strange people around TSBD (English Version)

Photographer Tom Dillard took pictures of the Texas School Book Depository showing persons on the 6th floor. In the Dal-Tex Building two persons were spotted giving exactly the same story - Eugene Brading and Larry Florer.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• JFK
• Assassination
• Charles
• Bronson
• Robert
• Hughes
• Dallas
• Texas
• November
• 22nd
• 1963

[deweycheethamandhowe]

@tregoj1 The gentleman next to Louis Witt did not have a radio. That is people seeing what they want to see in grainy photographs. And sticking out in the crowd is something one would want to do if they are staging a protest, which is what Witt was doing, not if they are participating in a covert executive action. Or do you think they thought, "let's make sure our signalman is the guy who is most noticable in the entire Plaza, that should help us cover up the crime"?

[deweycheethamandhowe]

@tregoj1 Witt's reasons for using an umbrella, was that it was a symbol of protest. The umbrella symbolizing Neville Chamberlin and the appeasement policies that Joe Kennedy Sr was in line with during the late 30's, early 40's. A bit esoteric, but more believable than someone making sure to be noticable when they are committing the crime of the century. Not to mention that a signalman on the ground would be unnecessary as Kennedy was at point blank range (for rifle fire) the entire time.

[deweycheethamandhowe]

@newsmanbluesman He did not give up the cab to an old lady. The cabbie told her there would be another, and, according to the cabbie, Oswald backed up this sentiment. As for not taking the Greyhound, clearly Oswald wanted to get his gun first, which is exactly what he did when he got home. As for the Coke, maybe he was thirsty, maybe he wanted a prop in his hand as to appear nonchalant and inconspicuous. Whatever the reason, it hardly erases the mountain of evidence pointing towards his guilt.

[deweycheethamandhowe]

@newsmanbluesman Oswald could have gone out the back, but he went out the front. Mainly because he likely knew that had he gone out the back, he would have had to double back to the front anyway, as his main means of transport, the bus, was in that direction. And it is subject to debate whether he actually helped MacNeil. MacNeil believes he did, but even he believes it is possible he was mistaken. In any case, Oswald only told him where a phone was, hardly a major interruption to his escape.

[MALCBAGGIE]

@tregoj1 Marina saw the shape of the blanket and relaxed-wrongly thinking the MC was there. So, if Oswald had curtain rods why would he leave them in Frazier's car? He was going back to 1026 NB that night. And if he left them in the car-where did they go? Or what did WBF do with them-he must have seen them. So, what was the identical empty package found by the sniper's nest? I've checked- the disassembled MC is 35 inches long-the bag on the SF-38 inches long. Did WBF and his sister measure it?

[MALCBAGGIE]

@tregoj1 Well, the boxes were there-& assembled by someone. He must have had time to construct it. As for no gunpowder smell-maybe the cops smelt it and didn't mention it. Conspiracy theorists contradict themselves by placing mysterious figures on the SF etc ( Hughes film) and assassins other than Oswald at that SFW-yet then deny shots were ever fired from there!

What intrigues me is the ''what if'' Bonnie Ray Williams hadn't left the sixth floor? Would LHO still have gone ahead?

[MALCBAGGIE]

@tregoj1 The heads are different-even with today's far more advanced photo technology false heads on bodies look rubbish. Independent experts examined the photos under microscopes and the grain was the same-you can't fake that. As for the lunchroom alibi- I assume you mean Carolyn Arnold. On 22/11/63 she gave two signed statements to the FBI- in one she never mentioned seeing him at all-and the other briefly in a hallway. Only (like many others) years later did she say she saw him in the LR.

[MALCBAGGIE]

@tregoj1 Yeah, but for years virtually all WC critics (most obviously Stone in JFK ) touted the Z film as PROOF of conspiracy, front shooter etc. So, why would they need to ''doctor'' it? Why would any conspiracy complicate things so? I believe a plot would have involved one gunman- dressed like Ossie- firing a gun ordered in his name etc They wouldn't have used ''Alex Hidell''.

[tregoj1]

@MALCBAGGIE The hole was captured on film. The Z film is doctored. The spray is painted on in one frame! It would surely last for more than 1/18th of a second! The Nix film shows JFK's head going back and to the right! The back of his head after the head shot is unnaturally dark in the Z film. The entire front skull is missing in several frames. If they used the second Oswald he would fool nobody! A disinegrating bullet would fragment and leave less blowout. An impact would show pink

[tregoj1]

@MALCBAGGIE The backyard photos are fakes. The same head is on all three. Nothing destroys the grassy knoll shooter and particularly not the many witnesses. Jackie would only be hit by a side shot! He had an alibi when he was seen in the lunchroom. He was told to stay by a phone. They said the fibers were from the blanket. Science in 1963 hmmm. Oswald got in a Nash Rambler with a man resembling Ruby and both ended up dealing with Tippit. Oswald's contact at the theater never showed.