Pat Buchanan On Antiwar Radio Part 2 of 5
Top Comments
All Comments (21)
-
"He was a liar."
No, you're a liar, Pat. (:
-
@mach3b You probably think the extremist Germans are more of a threat than the extremist Muslims or others I personally believe that it takes extremist Germans to defeat them....this will be a worldwide war and choose your allies wisely when a nationalist Germany rises again to save itself and Europe you'll be crying Nazis....
-
Hitler should have never joined the Japanese his alliance with non whites did him in
-
Go fuck yourself.
-
This is utter nonsense.
-
shut up idiot.
-
There is little question that Hitler wanted to avoid world war. He repeatedly made peace overtures to Poland's military dictatorship. He had, as even the British believed, a legitimate claim to Danzig and the Polish Corridor, and was willing to re-integrate those territories to the Reich while still allowing the Poles a degree of autonomy and thus an outlet to the Baltic. Britain's guarantee to Poland is seen by Buchanan as a blunder, whereas it appears to some as a deliberate invitation to war.
-
That's false, if you had read Buchanan's book, or have some knowledge on years prior to the war. Hitler signed with Pilsudksi a non-aggression pact between the two countries. Also, the Germans after World War 1(I believe) had a plan to create a Polish state. Read the book, it won't hurt. It's pretty cheap on Amazon too.
-
Thanks to that guarantee, the Polish brusquely turned down meetings on discussing the Danzig issue.
-
No, both guarantees were defensive. Germany promised to aid Austria if Russia mobilized to help Serbia. Austria threw all prudence out the window and decided on war, knowing Germany would come to its aid. The effect was much the same for Poland. They had much less reason to fear and less reason to negotiate (in their minds) than if Britain had not made that war guarantee.
Great stuff from Pat. He's bolder and even more blunt and revealing today than in years gone by. Stay strong Pat.
RedShirtArmy 3 years ago 4
Debunked by establishment historians who never take a different look at anything no doubt. The man (Taylor) had his opinions and other diplomatic historians have theirs. The book is still valuable in that it approached the issue from a fresh angle. My curiosity in reading it and appreciation of the work is a far cry from me being an "apologist" for Nazi Germany. Everyone would be better served if people took a deep breath and calmed down before talking about this issue in particular.
NationalCause 3 years ago 2