Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Steven Stamkos Shootout vs Kari Lehtonen Refs Toronto Suck

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,416
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 11, 2009

http://www.refssuck.com Steven Stamkos Shootout vs Kari Lehtonen 2/11/09 Refs and Toronto War Room Sucks!

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I was there and can tell you that the puck was not IN the pocket of his glove. It was almost up his sleeve, which was not over the line.

  • ok, if u watch a few tampa bay games, the refs are trying to KILL the lighting. im a fan of tampa, and i watch all of their games (i got the centre ice pack) and so i would no how many times a ref tried to make tampa lose.

see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It doesnt matter if it's in the glove either? They have to SEE the puck over the line to make a goal. And there is no such evidence of that. Right?

  • @ziebler

    what happened to logic?

  • First off the referees are not allowed to go against any particullar team because if they did they would get fired and they wouldn't be on the ice calling games so that isn't the case. Second when you see the initial play when the goalie shoveled it out at the end it looked like part of his glove is sitting on the goal line so you can't say goal because you don't know where under the glove the puck is it could be in or it can be sitting on the line and the puck has to cross completely.

  • It's no goal because the ref originally said no goal and in order to get the call reversed there has to be conclusive evidence that the puck went in the net and in all those replays you can't tell where that puck is.

  • That was in freiken ref

  • @TheHockeyCentral ya he also wasnt passed the d completely so the shot should never have been awarded 

  • Its the referee on the ice who rules it goal or not. Only after conclusive evidence the puck crossed the goal line. The call can be reversed. That means the puck MUST be visible crosses completely over the line. BTW: On penalty shots and shootouts, if the pucks forward motion is stopped on the attempt, no rebounds like in soccer.

    Signed,

    Dean of the Maple Leafs Nation.

    BTW: GO LEAFS GO !

  • Am I the only one that thinks that there should have NEVER been a penalty shot in the first place? When Stamkos was on the breakaway the defenseman hit the PUCK first before knocking Stamkos down. You can clearly see him knock Stamkos' stick resulting in the pick being knocked away puck away.

    There should have never been a penalty shot.

  • I saw it. NO GOAL!! It was on his sleeve, not in the glove. So the refs made a good call.

  • good goal.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more