Did Jesus Really Rise From The Dead? (NT Wright)

Dr. N. T. Wright speaks on the historical reliability of Jesus' resurrection.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Jesus
• Christ
• Resurrection
• Easter
• N.
• T.
• Wright
• Historical
• Gospels
• New
• Testament

[ydomanoaccount5je]

This has converted me to Christianity. Thank you rfvidz for this "vid".

[rfvidz]

@ydomanoaccount5je Praise God!

[Andy2542]

@ydomanoaccount5je

Praise the Lord Jesus Christ! A wonderful feeling on my behalf brother.

[dbzgtcrazy]

@ydomanoaccount5je Praise God! Welcome to the family and kingdom of God. Message me with any questions you have, and I will be pleased to at least try and answer your questions, although I certainly don't know everything and we may not be associated with the exact same Christian theological or denominational traditions. Anyway, feel free to contact me!

[vgblr]

Scietifically dead is dead.I do not think any rise again for anybody whosoever. But how come the most scientific western societies believe such a concept i am still surprised.

[DIBBY40]

To many pagans and gnostic christiansTHIS is the underworld of the dead.

[shieldsff]

thanks- Bishop Wright is truly compelling and informative- I am learning so much from his discussions on the thinking and outlook of the Apostle Paul. This man does a great justice to the literary tradition and scholarship of his fellow Oxford Christian thinker C.S. LEWIS

[NilDesperandum777]

@goremau Not at all. One doesn't have to advance a particular dogma in order to correct the inaccuracies of another. And in plain fact, it's what I've done thus far. You're entirely free to believe as you wish, but stating error however well-meaning, remains error. There's a reason "primus inter pares" is a contentious issue. I invite you to study why it is an issue at all. Roman Catholicism is more than a few contentious propositions. But you're under no obligation to parse them.

[NilDesperandum777]

@goremau That's well and fine, but like you're ignorance around "primus inter pares" as a concept and as a point of past and likely future consensus, I'm not A) Preaching Roman Catholicism to anyone, let alone you. B) Implying, hinting or plainly stating a wish to convert you. Conversion is God's exclusive purview, not a believer's. So whatever conversation you think you're having, or wish you weren't having has nothing to do with my comments directed toward you in sum, to this point.