Australia all out for 93!

Aussies owned big time by India - 93 all out, lose by 13 runs

Category:

Education

Tags:

• India
• Australia
• 93
• all
• out
• Border
• Gavaskar
• Trophy
• Tendulkar
• Sehwag
• 175
• 309
• 281
• 200
• world
• cup
• ipl
• t20

[triplebettslord]

I remember Sehwag was giving them a belting in Chennai, then the rain came and washed out the final day. Should have been a drawn series, but it happens. India should have won the series in Australia, but Ganguly made a mistake and did not enforce the follow-on in Sydney. India were the only team (apart from England in 2005) that looked like they could beat the top team.

Good on them, this was an amazing fight-back! And yes I am Australian, but I too hate what Bucknor did to India that game.

[Smashingpumpkins88]

@triplebettslord mmm but i think you forget the NZ outfit of 2001 0-0 after 3 tests in AUS but NZ would have won one of the matches if it wasnt for the rain

[LeroyRifkin]

well it's 93 more international runs than i've scored.

[omonoia23]

yeah australia wouldve lost in 2003/04 if ganguly enforced the follow on. but he didnt declare until day 3! he was going for the draw, thats what seperates the good teams from the others. australia was never happy with a draw.

[patorr69]

@Altiar253 Should have been 3-0. Absolutely pathetic how at that time and for 10 years previous as well that such a number 1 team struggled against low scores. To not be able to chase 106 is absolutely pathetic.

[YerFaceMateZz]

@soccer6669

Murali bowled at 9 degrees for his doosra, and when the question of its legality arose, the ICC found that: "based on official studies into bowling actions, which revealed that 99% of bowlers whose actions were examined exceeded the elbow flexion limits, ICC revised the limits applying to all bowlers in 2005.Muralitharan's doosra falls within the revised limits.

If the ICC itself isn't enough for you, youtube "Ian Chappel on Murali." He will explain it in simpler terms for you,

[soccer6669]

@YerFaceMateZz mate they changed the level by 9 degrees so he could bowl

they changed the rules about chucking

he did chuck

[YerFaceMateZz]

@soccer6669

Of course they would refuse to play you spastic. They accused him of chucking when he actually didn't. Why should they play when they are accused of doing something wrong, when they actually aren't? Don't bother telling me he chucks, the tests conducted by the Australians themselves go against you!

[Altiar253]

the most important school is underneath the score card Australia wins series 2-1

[soccer6669]

@YerFaceMateZz mate they were going to refuse to play

thats what happens when the teams in the sub-continent are caught for something

they have a bitch and the icc folds

[YerFaceMateZz]

@soccer6669

Sorry mate, he didn't chuck. He was tested multiple times, and was found to be legit. He was tested in AUSTRALIA mind you. So don't go around making up bullshit.

[soccer6669]

@YerFaceMateZz well he did but sri lanka refused to play unless he was allowed to bowl.