What is Existence pt 3

What is Existence? pt 3
Video Series: Fundamental natures.
(The nature of existence.)

Part 3 starts to looks at a potential state in terms of "information", as well as what "symmetry" means for the potential state and distinction.
Part 3 also continues our discussions on expressive states and the quantifying nature of interaction.

Please understand that the intention of this fundamental approach is not to overload its terms into some kind of interconnecting logic, although it makes sense that there is some kind of interconnection for it, even if shared by the condition of the approach.

It might help to consider that at this fundamental state, many of these terms are generally the equivalent of an entire nature.

Also keep in mind that one of our goals is to have a vocabulary/text approach that compliments the representations of mathematical formula/symbol approach.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• existence
• nature
• fundamental
• quantum
• quanta
• physics
• probability
• possibility
• potential
• interaction
• quantify
• distinction
• relationship
• identity
• information
• symmetry
• consciousness
• subconscious
• mind
• body
• theory
• logic
• reasoning
• philosophy
• representation
• review
• educational
• description
• tutorial
• discussion
• approach
• everything
• universe
• time
• reality
• infinite
• infinity
• spirit
• structure
• design
• system
• zero
• oneness
• process
• mechanics
• position
• equation
• definition
• truth
• why
• how
• crawlface

[bvssvni]

A system conserve energy when it acts on the potentials of a single object and inverse direction between objects (+,-) -> (+,+) & (-,+) -> (-,-) which transforms into potentials -+> and --> for the system to create a higher existence. There is no answer that "this is only what exist" because things are that can't be explained by causality or words. Dual nature/potential of single objects are used in physics simulation and can used to classify systems into real ones and illusions (they exist too)

[crawlFace]

@bvssvni

If we can define the elements of the system as being in relation to the act on potential of a single object, which we can, since the system's "act on it" qualifies the elements of the system,

then all elements can be treated in terms of interactions for the act on the potential of the object.

[crawlFace]

@crawlFace

The energy is the state of stabilization, which includes any unstable parts, but we define that all unstable parts are either on their way to becoming stable or are stable or make-up what it means to be stable, such as being necessary for a system, etc.

I’m thinking, "for the system", the conservation is the first-order logic you elaborated on, where the potential is proportional for all elements of the system being in relation to the act on an object,

[crawlFace]

@crawlFace

and the stabilization of the system can be expressed as a “position” representing the act, which includes the system and the object acted upon.

This position is the conservation, which is the potential and the interaction (or the energy of the interaction).

[bvssvni]

Looking at this video again, I understand more things that I've worked on recently. I think this description of existence is the ultimate one, because there is no logic alternative, even the effects of a such definition is pretty extraordinary since it allows you to explain an observation by examining the interaction alone without knowing what is causing it.

[crawlFace]

@bvssvni

Thank you. As you know from our extensive discussions, the point is not to predominantly theorize the case, but instead to recognize what is always the case no matter what we theorize.

[crawlFace]

@franktastikart

I'm not sure what the "blank page" is in reference to?

To help clarify, if in any of my diagrams/discussions I start out with a "blank page", it is to be understood that the blank page does not represent "nothing".

The best we can do is to start out with an absolute potential state, and all distinction/stabilization of the potential state are represented by interaction.

[franktastikart]

@rebokism if your saying that we came from nothingness then your wrong! that is a religious point of view! not a scientific one! we did not come from nothing. and anything that is not in are universe dose not exist are interact with anything! your blank page thing is wrong! if you were to do it the right way you would have to draw the circle follow the edges of the paper! not be in the middle! there is no empty space outside of the universe of any kind!

[BBZZZZZ]

Applause!