Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 Debate: Jon Gold V.S. Pat Curley Part Three

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,737
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 25, 2008

Part three of the debate between 9/11 Activist Jon Gold and Pat Curley the creator of the popular blog ScrewLooseChange.




The debate took place on Monday, November 24th, 2008 on the Franklin Pierce University closed circuit television show, The Dynamic Duo and was moderated by the show's hosts Justin Martell and Eric Jackman.




The only editing that has been done to the three segments is all references to commercials have been removed (to make the conversation continuous), along with the opening and closing credits. The content of the debate has not been altered in any way.




FP-TV's The Dynamic Duo is in no way affiliated with the GCN Radio Network show of the same name.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @scottishatheist go watch on youtube>mossad caught in vans on 9-11"filled with explosives" gw bridge>Don't assume you know what's on it.I thought I did.has actual police dispatch radio recording footage of officer speaking to hq describing the van he pulled over before it blew up and the israelis ran and were caught.It shows the cop describing the van,"the van has mural depicting nyc skyline w/jet diving into twin twrs exploding. 30 mins after it happened. Defend that moron. Write me back.

  • @sssssjjjj1 What I find more outrageous is after 9 years people still make sad claims that there wasn't wreckage at the Pentagon and at Shanksville. When a simple Google search can find lots of photos and testimonials of people who worked on both sites, and had the grim task of recovering body parts.

    What's more, they tell you to wake up, when they can't be bothered come up with a plausible alternative, and instead jump on the "New Investigation™" bandwagon and making a fool of themselves.

  • these people who defend the gov story after it is so obvious control demo, no wreckage at pentagon, no wreckage at shankesville, no plane hit 7, israelis dancing with van that ACTUALLY had a mural of twin towers with plane hitting them. This is on FBI files. This is outrageous. If you think about this and still think it's immaterial you are a vile individual. The israelis, 4 of them failed polygraph and the 5th refused to take one. Then released to Israeli custody. Wake up we need you!

  • why is there a debate, the towers were obviously blown up. i wish everyone would grow up

  • a very fair point really... can't deny it :-)

  • HOW would wtc7 be a demolition unless they were pre-set charges? and if wtc7 had preset charges, why wouldnt WTC1 and 2? becuase building dont just fall down like that dude. EVER.

  • Good, now go suck a penis.

  • Good now go fuck yourself punk.

  • holocaust deniers?

    Now your just slandering!

  • Robert hasn't been in NORAD for decades. Why would anyone argue about out of date information?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more