9/11: A Conspiracy Theory

Transcript and sources: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=2594

Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes.

• Category

  News & Politics

[BenjieGrant]

Sorry pal but you're not going to sucker me into playing your game by naming great scientific discoveries that first had hypothesis.

I'm neither a scientist nor an OCD'd stalker of this thread so I leave that to the professionals. My job as a member of the public is to decide whether the overall story seems legit, and whether the various investigations seem coherent.

Just because I disagree doesn't make it my job to perform another investigation, it's to ask for another aka finish the first!

[BenjieGrant]

I'm asking you to practice what you preach by telling why me I need to answer your questions in the first place. You have completely failed to abide by even your own personally tailored guidelines for everybody else. Hypocrite much?

I've got another question for you: What are the circumstances of your life that allow you to spend day and night here? Is it a deep personal obsession? Because honestly you fit the profile of somebody who is either manic or what I'd picture a paid shill would be.

[AlQaedaIsReal]

"truthers" come to a foregone conclusion, then desperately clutch at anomalies to support their theory (whatever it is for that particular day lol)

[BenjieGrant]

Ok for one release the WTC rubble so it can be tested for explosive residue NIST didn't test because they "didn't think they would find" anything? LOL how unscientific is that!!??

2nd release an ACTUAL video showing an airplane hitting the pentagon from any one of the hundreds of cameras, not some blurry 5 frame copout that shows absolutely nothing.

What the hell happened to the Freedom of Information Act? This story holds true across the board for countless classified or destroyed items.

[hgfbob]

"What high temeprature?"

EXACTLY!!!

what HIGH TEMP!

"None of the samples tested indicated exposure to the range of temperatures sufficient to weaken the steel and initiate global progressive collapse"[NCSTAR 1-3]

why is there NO found representation of this HYPOTHESIZED HIGH TEMP WTC steel that failed from THESE fires present within the 10,000+ page NIST report?

[hgfbob]

"the major internal collapse of WTC 5."

5 did NOT globally collapse as the other three, and burnt till the NEXT DAY, and still did not collapse as the others three.

so your comparison is both MORONIC and irrelevant.

tell us HOW FIRE ALONE removes 105 feet globally WITHIN 1.74 seconds so acceleration EQUAL to Gravity can ensue, GLOBALLY and UNIFIED IMMEDIATELY following at 1.75 seconds to 4.0 seconds.

[ucancallmeOh]

Yes, by all means verify the links.

Check to see that the science and math on AE911Truth(dot)org are correct.

Verify the statements by former CIA, FBI, military officers, first responders, witnesses who heard explosions, family members of victims who want justice, etc on PatriotsQuestion911(dot)com

And, by all means, make sure PBS didn't screw up by airing Experts Speak Out. Were the architects, engineers, scientists, and demo experts truthful? If not, you should sue PBS!

[Wim Ahlers]

What high temeprature?

As said in my previous answer, since you have no clue what you are talking about I suggest you first contact accredited scientific institutions with subject matter knowledge.

For instance, the accredited sources that explained the major internal collapse of WTC 5.

So, before you start talking about papers you claim to be entitled to, you first should study the matter with the papers that are already there.

Make it so.

[Wim Ahlers]

First tell what is wrong about that what is already known.

You seem to completely ignore that.

I guess it is your lack of knowledge that makes you question what already is there.

As such I suggest you leave it to the expert and cure your incredulity by verification by accredited legal and scientific institutions.

Make it so.