9/11 In Plane Site [2-8] Director's Cut [Dave VonKleist]

Full film - http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=2361717427531377078
[Alternate] http://www.megavideo.com/?v=T09YQ08G
[Alternate] http://blip.tv/file/2028580
[Alternate] http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/activism_non_profit/watch/v1828934...

http://Drey.orgfree.com
CHECK OUT THE OCULAR STREAM!

Health & Politics Section
http://Drey.orgfree.com/Politricks.html

Hundreds of Films, TV Shows, Documentaries, Comedy, everything full-length, linked material sourced by me from all across the internet.
_____

Why were America and the world never shown the video and photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16 ft. hole?

Many people do not realize that the outer wall did not collapse until almost 30 minutes after the initial impact.

See these astonishing photographs and video footage for the first time.

Given that the outer wall of the Pentagon had not yet collapsed and the only hole is approximately 16 ft. in diameter - how does a jetliner over 44 feet tall and 125 ft. wide fit into that hole as shown in the crystal-clear and close-up photographic evidence from the Pentagon?

Furthermore, can physics explain why there is no damage to the Pentagon's upper floors where the tail section would have hit? ?

"I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast... it sounded nothing like an airplane." Lon Rains - editor for Space News (Pentagon eyewitness)

In the aftermath, it was reported by media sources that a giant 100 ft. crater was plowed into the front lawn of the Pentagon as the result of a powerful airliner crash.

Why does photographic evidence overwhelmingly show that this was absolutely not the case?

Why no crater?
Why no skid marks?
Why no burn marks?
Why was the entire world deliberately mislead?

Examine the video and photographic evidence for yourself.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• drey.orgfree.com
• the
• ocular
• stream
• 911
• 9/11
• 9-11
• pentagon
• evidence
• attack
• terrorist
• conspiracy
• proof
• stealth
• bomber
• Surveillance
• Camera
• Plane
• Crash
• footage
• 757
• boeing
• AA
• 77
• WTC
• Impact
• Truth
• missile
• world
• trade
• center
• september
• 11
• bush
• demolition
• war
• terror
• terrorism
• truth
• military
• twin
• towers

[xpsychonovax]

Inside job.

[Rene09091971]

07:38, the 757 hit the building nearly at 0 feet. How do you pass with a 757 the street lights, the sings over the street without any damage? And how did they "dive" after the sings and street lights with this plane? how? the street is alos light up, like a bridge (if it isnt a bridge ??) That is crap.. sorry but totally BS. And also, a 757 near 0 feet.. yeah, sure.. the physics, nothing fits here..

[carolinatim]

(cont'd) This would have left a hole much smaller that the full wingspan of the plane, the guy assumes the wings of a 757 are stronger than the concrete building and would simply break through and leave a hole. He also assumes they did not hit the ground first. This would also account for no debris on the lawn since momentum would have carried the debris forward into the building. I could go on but I have wasted anough time dispelling this idiots video.

[carolinatim]

(cont'd) The plane had to be on a downward trajectory, otherwise it would have hit many things before arriving at the Pentagon. So now we have a plane that is shorter than he claims on a downward trajectory hitting the building probably around its base. Very plausible that the upper floors were not damaged by the fuselage. Next, if we assume the plane hits right around the base of the building, it would have disintegrated and the larger pieces would have continued into the building.

[carolinatim]

This theory about the Pentagon is just stupid. First of all the guy keeps harping about the height of a 757 being 44ft and would thereby have damaged the upper floors of the building. First of all, he is measuring the height of the plane while it is SITTING ON ITS LANDING GEAR. I doubt the plane was gear down upon impact. Now the plane is several feet shorter than he claims. Next, he assumes that the plane was flying straight and level upon impact. This is obviously impossible.

[beasmith1]

@Rene09091971 The one by Russian7777? That's a smaller pane, & yes it gets mullered on impact, not sure I am getting your point hun?

[Rene09091971]

@beasmith1 sorry. watch?v=zI-FkWJaVEs my bad. :)

[beasmith1]

@Rene09091971 Or this one, am copying & pasting it, but not getting anything to do with 9/11?

[beasmith1]

@beasmith1 I can't seem to get this link to work?

[Rene09091971]

@beasmith1 thanks for the vid btw.

[Rene09091971]

@beasmith1 watch the clip which i posted, a wooden pole cut through a wing like knife in butter and still stand!. WTC outside was DOUBLE strong as a tank. Pentagon was just new heavy armored, much stronger that WTC´s walls. This, "plane" which hits pentagon hits several, aluminium poles before crashed into building. When a plane hits a tank, will it also then "disappear" into the tank and come out on the other side? Folks, stop to think that video games, are reality. Used your minds folks.

[Rene09091971]

@beasmith1Thanks. I just saw this days ago about a test of plane crash. At time frame 0:29 you see the wings hitting a wooden pole (I read diameter 20 cm) and it goes through the entire wing like a hot knife through butter. watch?v=zI-FkWJaVEs&feature=re­lated