09 Lancer GTS Turbo And 2004 Lancer RalliArt Turbo
Uploader Comments (Kevo890)
Video Responses
All Comments (33)
-
@flavordave12 Not reliably...
-
@cavaderblood u ca run up to 12 lbs on stock
-
@playray91 really I don't think weight is the issue, the CVT is a belt drive. Belt drive is great for motorcycles, but its very limiting on cars.
-
@nephilymbass1 You can do that with the GTS as well >_>
-
I test drove a bunch of lancers when I bought my 2011 GTS. The manual feels like it has at least 30 more hp than the CVT. I considered the CVT because my wife cant drive stick but theres nothing like dropping from 5th to 3rd with the manual. Trust me get the manual. Personally I love my GTS and plan on keeping it and throwing a 4b11t in it down the road as it bolts right up to the manual GTS transmission. . BTW AWD is way overated. I see FWD civics outrun Evos at my local track every weekend
-
@yooloop I would assume the manual is alot faster due to the fact that the transmission is alot lighter then an automatic car
-
Honestly the RRM Turbo kit is pointless, you can only run up to 5 lbs. of boost with stock internals. Get a ralliart! The extra money is worth the all wheel drive! I have a GTS, but man do I want to upgrade.
-
@Kevo890 Alright thanks. I have the CVT haha >.< but I'm only in highschool so I couldn't ask for more :) still love the car I have. Maybe one day I'll upgrade to the EVO though !
do you know if the cvt turbo'd is as fast as the manual transmition turbo'd?
yooloop 1 year ago
@yooloop I'm not really sure, but I can find out for you if you want me too....
Kevo890 1 year ago
@Kevo890 Thatt would be awesome if you could find out :D
yooloop 1 year ago
@yooloop The manual is quite a bit faster than the CVT...
Kevo890 1 year ago
@yooloop ok, give me till tomorrow
Kevo890 1 year ago