Impact explosion vs jet fuel fireball
Loading...
Loading...
6:42
Inside 9/11 - Who controlled the planes?by inside911films102,583 views- 1:53
Strange things in 911 footage - look closelyby nwodetox35,901,594 views
- 1:41
Tanker Fireby warner4az6,460 views
- 10:54
9/11 Coincidences (19/19)by NufffRespect364,849 views
- 0:36
NASA Jet fuel Factory Explosionby qwap0371,812 views
- 14:36
NIST FOIA: Abramson & Sabio Clips 01-05 (WTC2 Impact Explosion, 9:03am)by TheMKMonarch2,403 views
- 1:37
Rocket Factory explosionby robytar87,994 views
- 4:16
Controlled Demolition vs. WTC Collapseby muzicmaker200166,592 views
- 0:25
911 Will You Believe Them Againby dhudson369892,407 views
- 7:32
Trentemøller-take me into your skinby smileyfacesam1,272,661 views
- 0:51
WTC7 - Incriminating evidenceby Mintaka33285,603 views
- 5:33
WTC 7 Before Collapseby IC911STUDIES186,387 views
- 3:27
Achieving the glamour look / one single light on the modelby TheStudioCoach660,687 views
- 2:27
Libya: jet fighter shot down - Libye: avion de chasse abattu (March 19 2011)by AgoraVoxFrance143,146 views
- 1:34
UFO Almost Hit F5-Jet During Air Showby bipyramid19,209 views
- 0:24
Bad Landing Aircraft Crash Jet Fighterby SuperFunnyVideos2011389 views
- 2:27
Def MP Jet Fuel Burn 204by PLF707635 views
- 10:22
9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!by NufffRespect24,970,857 views
- 9:31
First Flight -- Jet Fuel From Algae -- Part 1 of 3by AlgaeCrudeOil5,814 views
This test should have been done by the GOV Don't Ya Think !!! LMAO they think were stupid and thats a serious misasumption Did I just invent a word ? LOL I know I've never written it before is it supposed to have 2 S's? LOL sorry have to be able to laugh at this crap once in awhile because to understand the whole scope of all this and combine it with patriot act and now S1867!! 1867 has a fire under my ass!We and they are in real trouble
Ancientmirrors1 2 months ago
@Ancientmirrors1 I think we should be a scale replica model of a jet, put a pulse engine on it and fly it flat out in a steel replica of tower and see how much damage it does to the steel. I bet your right. i'm sure there isnt much on board that is stronger than steel. People allways say the weight but forces work both ways and the weaker one breaks.
benjyboba 2 months ago
@Ancientmirrors1 There is lot more to the physics than just simplicity but I do believe the weaker material would get it, ok we have shape too but as you say aluminum against steel. Maybe I should get a aluminum model plane and build a steel tower and crash it into it to see what happends. pulse jet model so its mega fast. I heard from others that it shouldnt penitrate. All makes us wonder.
benjyboba 2 months ago
@benjyboba Ok mass/weight vs material,I'm an ex ironworker,I have seen the vids where an ALUMINUM plane Goes thrugh a steell structure this is impossible sorry all this is just impossible the gov't story is BS!Stomp an aluminum can it will not penetrate your boot this may be pretty accurate proportions
Ancientmirrors1 2 months ago
Maybe the speed of the impact and fuel actually touching the air caused it to burn off so fast. If you watch flame throwers on youtube, your see a simular effect, the flame in the air vanishes but only when it touches the ground does it actually burn. Maybe thats why the fireball burn off so quick is because it was spread out in the air. Someone do a test to find out. Fly a model plane with jet fuel into a structure to simulate and see how it would burn off. A fast jet one to prove things.
benjyboba 4 months ago
@ShootBlueHelmets Uh, no it's not the official story at all you dipshit. THE FIRE, initiated by the jet fuel, and structural damage to teh twin towers caused the collapse. Welcome to 10 years ago you idiot sheep of a twoofer. Suggest you read the NIST reports, none of them say the jetfuel was the cause, not one. The fires resulting, yes, but each NIST report says the fuel burned up within minutes...suggest you fucking read and get off youtube.
Oz1976 7 months ago
@ShootBlueHelmets Check out this retards comments a few pages back and you'll see this dude doesnt have the critical thinking skills of a doorknob. I really think he is that stupid. Since he has no argument his M.O. seems to be clog the comment board so logical discussion is obfuscated or missed. I think he needs to inform his supervisors he lacks the intellectual capacity to perform this type of work. Next team... LOL!!!
izzysykopth 7 months ago
@Oz1976 Wow, this must be why I rarely check for replies. No one says jet fuel caused the collapse? Where have you been? It is called the official story, "moron." It is what National Geographic and government agencies used to try a mock-up. You are correct on the office fires existing after the fuel. Now get the government to say that as the official reason. Now tell me how office fires, which burn even cooler (explaining darker smoke) brought down a steel frame structure. Oh wait, 3 structures.
ShootBlueHelmets 7 months ago
Had UA 175 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip, the explosion would have taken place at the point of impact on the OUTER steel framed wall of WTC 2. Instead the videos show UA 175 flying THROUGH the outer wall without crashing into it and the explosion occurring INSIDE the tower.
This defies basic crash physics.
lmfecher 8 months ago 2
@Oz1976 Go pitch it to all 7 of your subs. Another cowardly psyops agent carrying out the agenda of his masters, threats of physical harm and condoning the murder of children. Go lie in the tomb and whack off with your sodomite buddies. 911 was an inside job carried out by US Brit and Israeli intell. To ignite the wars between Jews and Muslims so that Rome might benefit in the end. You still have not answered me. WHERE is the wreckage?
izzysykopth 8 months ago