Real Time with Bill Maher - Religion Gives Crazy the Platform

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,492
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 2, 2011

A reasonable argument by Bill on Real Time of July 29th 2011 about the idea that religion provides the crazy people with a platform to do crazy acts (like Andreas Brevik), and the same old response from the Christian of the panel (Brigitte Hoover), mixing the concept of Atheism with an ideology!!! Don't these people ever read?

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Let me make this clear. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot... DID NOT kill in the name of atheism (or non-belief, as I prefer to call it). I repeat: they DID NOT kill in the name of non-belief. And Hitler was a catholic.

  • That bitch drives me crazy. Stalin was not a secular person. He wanted to be a god, banning all other beliefs and forcing his people to worship his leadership. He did not believe in god but he created a state religion, a system that revolved around him.

    Just like Kim and Mao. All systems Identical to religion

see all

All Comments (66)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • HBO. I live Bill Maher and his show.

  • haha dumb bitch

  • I love this guy what channel is he on

  • she is not in the kitchen

  • Is there some reason that Republican conservative women always have bleach blonde hair??

  • @xmaneater While I agree regarding Stalin, Mao, and Pol pot. Hitler wasn't a catholic. He respected Catholicism and the church mentioned him a few times but Hitler actually believed in some weird voodoo anti-semetic shit that never really made any sense.

  • Being an atheist terrorist is impossible. Atheism is the absence of belief, not the belief of absence. You can't kill in the name of nothing, that's just being a dick for the sake of being a dick.

  • For the truth about religion watch "Frankie Boyle on religion"

  • @MsDDiddy Do you really need me to spell it out for you? Wow, ok. If a terrorist is fighting against the expansion of the american army into their territory, and not because of some divine command from Allah, it would be wrong to call him a muslim terrorist. That's my point.

  • @IneffableLifestyle and take away the "muslim" terrorists' religion and they'd just be people against western culture and the expansion of the american army into their territory. what's your point?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more