National Geographic Science & Conspiracy Part 6
Top Comments
All Comments (229)
-
@neilus It just goes to show you that ppl are either too proud to be an American citizen or are too much of a wishful thinker to understand that the official story of 9/11 cannot possibly be true. Yup, that's the key reason why many ppl still believe that 9/11=TERRORIST ATTACK
The government was well aware that ppl would find evidence that a missile and not a plane hit the Pentagon, but they were also aware that many ppl would deny the evidence no matter how convincing it seems.
-
Gee, I can't help but be skeptical over the fact that the images of airliner debris didn't come out until AFTER french jounalist Thierry Meyssan wrote his 2002 book '9/11: The Horrifying Fraud' about how a plane couldn't have possibly hit the Pentagon. What a coincidence!
Are we actually expected to believe that these photos are authentic when it took several months to release them. I DON'T THINK SO! Those images have PHOTOSHOP written all over them.
-
7:37-The wings were of little consequence cuz the Pentagon was so heavily reinforced.
Is this supposed to be a coverup or is EMRTC flat out retarded? HELLO, the wings are the STRONGEST part of the plane, and the engines are the strongest part of the wings!
For real, this documentary IS NOT impartial and favors the official story over the truthers' claims. They were less impartial than the History Channel 9/11 documentary was, but impartial nonetheless. Sorry Nat Geo, YOU GOOFED!
-
once more, pls explain...1.put options, 2.molten steel, 3.PNACs 'we need a new pearl harbor' 4.fireproof passports and bandana 5. nose out shot 6.bush claiming to have seen 1st drone impact live! 7. missing plane at pentagon 8. missing plane in shanksville 9.wtc7! 10. cheney and rumsfeld saying 93 was shot down! 10. NORAD standdown 11. nanothermite found 12. ppl hearing wtc basement blow up b4 any drone hit 12. core steel columns clearly sliced through, continued....
-
Well done FOX TV Still bringing high grade bullshit.
-
I don't understand the dispute regarding what struck the Pentagon. I also find it ironic that in the study meant to disprove the truther theory about a cruise missile calls their suspicions irrelevant, which is a hypocritical claim considering the light in which the truthers have been shown throughout this feature.
Whether or not 9/11 was an inside job, the fact that the government has since been systematically eliminating our rights is enough to give one pause.
-
Attn: RJC24 and you opponents of truth...
All we know is SOMETHING hit the bldg. That's it.
By not showing the vids they FORCE critical minds to wonder.
Anyone who doesn't wonder.....
I wonder about them....
-
At least Creationists can account their unfathomable stupidity to the religious brain baths they've been taking all their lives... By comparison, Trutheres are truly pathetic for the simple reason that the only thing standing between them and an accurate and rational world view is their own personal paranoia.
-
national geographic is owned by FOX NEW.
can somebody please explain to me the logic behind the truthers' rejection of an actual photograph of the plane wreckage? it's right there before your own eyes but...you don't want to be wrong so you just claim it's fake or something? jesus fucking christ i don't get it
pinkycheeks 9 months ago 11
Bush: "ok lets create some bullshit we can blame on the Muslims so we can go and nick all their oil"
Insider: "cool, lets fire a fucking great cruise missile into the pentagon and say it was a hijacked plane"
Bush: "ummm, wont people see that it was a missile?"
Insider: "nah, they wont notice"
Surely....even the most monumentally retarded US president ever wouldnt have been THAT dumb?????
neilus 8 months ago 8