The moon landing and other conspiracy theories

http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2008/05/10/the-moon-landing-and-other-co...

Links mentioned in video:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
http://www.uwgb.edu/DutchS/PSEUDOSC/ConspiracyTheoryDidWeGototheMoon.htm

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yoT6V8XP6QA
httpv://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yoT6V8XP6QA

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Moon
• landing
• conspiracy
• theories
• sceptic
• scepticism
• science
• proof
• evidence
• Apollo
• program
• dark
• side
• hoax

[gendoboy]

dude your reasons why it happened....not very strong evidence. just because a rock has holes in it....LOOK A MOON ROCK there are tons of those where i live. the rocket taking off? unmanned maybe?!

[ArgusEyes]

As I understand it. The rock has special characteristics that rock on earth does not have.

[jackheaney]

It obviously was not faked. 750,000 people were involved in creating the mission, can you imagine the massive lid that would have to be kept on that secret? Someone would have blabbed, it would of come out somehow.

You can claim anything is a conspiracy if you want to believe it enough.

[winterstellar]

@chippedbeef08 You couldn't, I'll give you that. But you see, not everybody is retarded. There aren't many retards among the rocket scientists or astronauts.: )

[chippedbeef08]

We couldn't have landed on the moon.

[amitrayit1990]

No blast crater is due to the very small acceleration due to gravity (which is 9.8m/s^2 on earth). since force = mass x gravity...and accelearation due to gravity on moon is 1.6m/s^2. The reason it did not make a blast crater is the force exerted was too small....please understand some physics first please.

[drewid88]

".the government is kepping tabs on citizens with biological gps systems that are disguised as birthmarks?"

Better than that, The latest one I heard was that the gubmint is spying on us through our digital TV equipment, which is why TV companies are switching the analoguie equipment off.

\o\oh there's another as well. "NASA is _propogating_ the moon hoax theories out there in order to gain funding ZOMG"

[drewid88]

von Braun went scouting for possible training sites. Antarctica has some of the worlds driest spaces, so may have been a viable site, but it was too inconvenient.

Lunites (lunar meteorites) are chemically changed by the trip through the atmosphere, and absorb moisture once they are here. They are different from the rocks apollo brought back as verified in labs all over the world.

The Soviets and the UK tracked the missions all the way there and back again.

[AwsomestKill]

watch myth busters lol and i am pretty sure a moon rock is different from rocks were you live

[VannaTroms]

Moon hoax believers dont ignore the moon rocks. They say that Werner von Braun went to Antarctica to collect samples from a meteorite. There is a lot of evidence that indicates that man never walked on the moon. No blast crater, weird ligtning and the list goes on and on.

The astronauts were launched with the rocket into earth orbit where they stayed for about 8 days and then descended to earth.

[avran89]

this goes to show that there are still people that still believe in crack-pot theroies , what's next?...the government is kepping tabs on citizens with biological gps systems that are disguised as birthmarks? or little green men are sending mind control rays in power lines?

[philomorphologian]

Very interesting point of view. Problem: you mention two very different challenges to 'accepted belief'- moon landings and UFO/aliens in the same breath. I agree that evidence is vital to prove (beyond reasonable doubt) that a theory is correct. That is a definition of science. What you forget to say is that (for example) large amounts of evidence for lunar expeditions is missing (what a waste- and WHY?); MUCH of the evidence, destroyed. That is why counter-argument uses the bits; no choice!