::: STOP PAYING CHILD SUPPORT NOW! ::: Texas Paternity Fraud Lawyer | Glen M. Crocker |

STOP PAYING CHILD SUPPORT NOW!
-------------------------------------------------------------
If you believe you have been wrongfully declared the father of a child, you may be a victim of paternity fraud. Until now, if you 1) signed an acknowledgment of paternity; or 2) were declared to be the father by a court with proper jurisdiction and you failed to contest the matter within four years, you were the father by operation of law even if you had been duped into believing you were the father and you had DNA samples showing that you were not the father.
However, there is good news for fathers who believe they are victim of paternity fraud. SB 785, recently passed by the Texas Legislature and signed by the Governor of the State of Texas, gives any man a one year window from September 1, 2011 to terminate his parent-child relationship with a child who's not biologically his. So, men who have been paying support for years will be able to go to court and learn whether they are the biological father. If you are not, the parent-child relationship will be terminated.

Moreover, if the parent-child relationship is terminated because you are found not to be the biological father, any child support obligation will end at that time. Any accrued indebtedness or interest will still be owed and will have to be paid. Likewise, you cannot get reimbursed for amounts paid in child-support.

Non-biological fathers such as adoptive fathers or those who consented to artificial insemination by another man are not covered by this law.
Here's (http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/82R/billtext/pdf/SB00785F.pdf) the text of the bill that's on Governor Perry's desk.

Again, there is a one year window of opportunity starting on September 1, 2011 to challenge paternity. According to the new statute, all you have to do is:

1. File a sworn Suit for Termination of Parent Child Relationship by September 1, 2013;

2. Have a preliminary hearing for the court to determine whether there is any proof of the validity of the claim;

3. If so, the court has no choice but to order a paternity test.

4. If paternity test is negative, the court must terminate the relationship.

GLEN M. CROCKER
-------------------------------------------------------------

Glen Crocker graduated from Thurgood Marshall School of Law and was licensed to practice law in Texas in 1998. He graduated from Lamar University in 1995 with a criminal justice degree. As a criminal and family law lawyer, Mr. Crocker has spent much time in the court room focusing his skills on advocating for his clients. He is also listed in the Who's Who for Executive and Professions and is a member of the Hardin County Bar Association, the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, Texas Young Lawyers Association, and Southeast Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association.

CROCKER LAW FIRM
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Crocker Firm is located on the third floor of the Texas State Bank Building, just off Interstate Highway 10 in Beaumont. From I-10, take the Calder exit and drive West about one-half block. The building is orange tile and can be seen from the freeway.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• paternity fraud
• child support
• stop paying child support
• paternity fraud lawyer
• paternity lawyer
• glen crocker
• texas lawyer

[anyonomis13]

paying money to a broke ass bitch because she slept with you isnt child support.its prostitution and pimping.except dudes are the prostitutes and cse is the pimps!

[domram12]

@sweetpuss00 IF THE WOMAN HAS 100% CUSTODY OF THE CHILD where they are together as a family but the man is OUT THE DOOR, THEN WHY SHOULD THE MAN HAVE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT when he does NOT live with them and is not part of the family? MEN SHOULD NOT PAY ANY AMOUNT TOWARDS CHILD SUPPORT IF HE DOESN'T HAVE CUSTODY.Women who have 100% custody of a child SHOULD PAY 100% OF ALL EXPENSES towards the child. Being a dad but NOT having custody of the child is NOT BEING PART OF THE FAMILY.

[sweetpuss00]

It goes both ways but yes its the womans responsibity to take care of herself and if she does not then it does fall on her instead of trying to trap the man as it always seems to be the case...

[revan7666]

Why the hell do we even have child support still? If a woman is dumb enough not to take precautions, then that is on her, and so is the fallout. If you cant wait till you can afford a child and are married, then that is your financial burden. Taxpayers should not have to clean up your mess!