lipstick on obama (5 oinks for Sarah)

You can put lipstick on a male chauvinist pig....
It's still a male chauvinist pig.

Notice that the audience KNOWS Obama is talking about Sarah Palin, Obama knows the audience knows he is talking about Sarah Palin, and he does nothing to disabuse them of that notion.

Five oinks for Sarah.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Sarah
• Palin
• lipstick
• pig
• Barack
• Obama
• Joe
• Biden

[neoconsaredumb]

McCain said the exact same thing about Hillary's Health Care Plan. Where is the outrage against McCain?

[miat1111]

LIPSTICK:

Lipstick and hillary are non sequiturs. This as opposed to Sarah, who had just described herself in terms of the lipstick she wears.

PIGS:

The disparity occurred precisely because 'pig' is arguably a reasonable descriptor of hillary clinton and has nothing to do with the lovely and beauteous Sarah.

[osiris33]

This is a stupid video.

[tnichols321]

So john mccain can get away with the same comment?

[jetchin55]

he is not raciest r sexiest u idiot he choose hillary for Secretary of state u stupid piece of shit u really need to know whats going on in ur country and spend less time jerking off on ur mom and dads home sex videos!!

[whisperingpaddle]

hahahaha lipstick on a pig applies perfectly to that bimbo! "Nailin' Palin" was done so easily by 2 canadian pranksters, that pigs are insulted at their intelligence so unfairly compared!

[kevin050780]

Obama is not only racist but now he is sexist also? lol amazing

[faipopo01]

Great video.

[yokohamaobasan]

Sean Hannity is a lying pig.

[aMaRiKa72]

I agree, the argument Obama is making that he doesn't understand the innuendo of the "lipstick on a pig" comment either says he is stupid or he does understand and he claims to be stupid. Either way, he comes up stupid.

[MountAthos]

GREAT JOB MIAT!!!!!!

[thatgregguy]

"On all, it is no contest. Obama + Biden are clueless, inept, ethically challenged + dangerous." ...and so is McCain and Palin.

Well tell me MiaT..who would you have liked to have voted for come November? Hopefully someone not linked to CFR to restore your credibility.

With regards to Palin none of what I said are distortions. All you have to do is look it up..so easy was it for you to compile data on the Clintons yet you won't look at anything with regards to Palin..why?

[Oofloom]

So because *some* people in the audience *might* have thought Obama was calling Palin a pig, that means he was definitely calling her a pig?

There's a video of McCain is which he uses the exact same expression while referring to Clinton policies. Same words, same context. Is it possible that some people in that McCain audience thought he was calling Clinton a pig? Notice all the GOP women who have been arguing that Obama was also calling McCain a "stinky fish"? They're morons and you know it.

[miat1111]

thatgregguy:

Your statement of Palin's positions are distortions.

That said, I don't agree totally w/ any of the candidates + none of the candidates is, in my view exceptional.

(The professional pol is mediocre, power-obsessed + corrupt or corruptible by definition.)

How, then, to vote? I believe we must look at the big issues: national security, i.e., the war on terror, the economy, character. On all, it is no contest. Obama + Biden are clueless, inept, ethically challenged + dangerous.