Proof that evolution can create complexity

I'm sick of creationists using the old watchmaker argument which is completely false..

Source: http://www.genetic-programming.com/

Note: I believe biological evolution is a subset of general evolution. Another subset is genetic programming.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• evolution
• creationism
• dna
• genetic
• programming
• richard
• dawkins
• darwin
• debate

[AntsanParcher]

Those things are all really nice, but your video doesn't really provide this much information. You cite no sources, you provide no further reading and although I do believe that those things might have been developed by genetic algorithms you only claim that stuff without backing it up. When arguing (I think that this is what you do) with creationists you won't achieve much this way. It's hard enough when you put real work into this.

[nawitus]

@AntsanParcher Video description edited (seems that YouTube lost my earlier comment..).

[BRITISHISM]

What is the title of the piano music you used? Thanks

[nawitus]

@BRITISHISM 'Cid Highwind's theme from FF7'

[nawitus]

@Sykarus Just because science hasn't explained everything (and some of your questions belong to philosophy), doesn't mean religion can give any answers. Even if some religions happen to be true, the only way to verify it would be science, so religion is useless in any case.

You should study philosophy, not religion.

[nawitus]

@bobthesmiley No, the scientific community does understand, but your professor and/or you don't.

[kokalol7]

so a fish evolved it's fins to walk on earth cause their was a need for that function? and it's gills turn to air breathing lungs cause their was a need for that function? How come my gay friend's butt has not evolved into a vagina? cause my other gay friend is pissed off that his dick smells like shit? lmfao

[Casshyr]

Creationists need update their knowledge, it is quite rude of them to just keep repeating the same debunked statements over and over nd over and voer

[AntsanParcher]

@Sykarus Science is not used to provide answers. The tool to do that is philosophy, which can help you to fill your life and the world around you with meaning. Science is only a tool to find predictability in how the world around you behaves. It works via making predictions, testing whether they hold true and based on the new experiences made through this process, try to find better predictions - what is better, is not decided by science, but by which goals you want to achieve.

[theguyi26]

wow nice "video"

[gacktxrawr]

@nawitus :)

[BRITISHISM]

Thanks!!