911 AMATEUR part2

New SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info

Please watch SEPTEMBER CLUES before leaving any comments on this video, thanks :
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FAFFDE39F342242C

IMPORTANT UPDATE : I have posted a high-resolution version (from the original Naudet DVD "911") here :
"THE PLANE FACTS " : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkZKOqYMbXo&fmt=18


911 AMATEUR pt2 :
If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice.

The Naudet footage is maybe the most diffused of all the 9/11 images so there is no possible question in regard to its "authenticity" - so to speak....as it is forged.

My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ). I wasn't able to perform this analysis earlier as the 4 versions I had of this famous footage were not as good resolution as this 5th version I recently found.

The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a crass graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly :

MAIN EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :

We may observe that the visible right side ( not covered by 1st explosion dust) of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, as much as 30% of the wall is still intact - AFTER the 1st impact. At the 6sec mark we see shape charges igniting and eventually ripping open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember.

As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the 911 hoax planners : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the 160ft gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1.

NOTE TO SKEPTICS : No, that black gash appearing suddenly is NOT smoke - it appears too quickly and develops in opposite wind direction.

The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET (a missile's most likely - as at the Pentagon...) crashed into the WTC1 or - for that matter - WTC2 (see SEPTEMBER CLUES).

In my honest opinion, the plane / no plane debate is now over. Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law.

911 AMATEUR part1 :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM&fmt=6

911 AMATEUR part3 :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vI3ZpLuz3ts&fmt=6


To download my main 9/11 research "SEPTEMBER CLUES" in high resolution, please visit :
http://www.thesocialservice.it

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• naudet
• wtc
• nyfd
• no
• planes
• tv
• fakery
• giuliani
• television
• news
• september
• clues
• 11
• cnn
• fox
• cbs
• nbc
• abc
• bbc
• bush
• shoes
• crime
• crash
• hate
• love
• scam
• war
• iraq
• victims
• hoax
• fake
• dogs
• cats
• boys
• girls
• commercial
• free

[Grommo]

Sorry simon. But you are going to have to try harder than that .

Your video is easily debunked and is rather childish .

Will you have the integrity to leave my comments up and write a written carefully reasoned response? I have made copies of my comments and forwarded them to a number of prominent 911 truthers.

[simonshack]

@Grommo Firstly, it would be good if you addressed ALL the points raised in my video analysis. For you to say it is 'easily debunked' on the strength of one single, ancillary point of your choice is not intellectually correct. I will list all those points in my next comment. For now I have one question related to your argument: what exactly would have caused the fire in that rightmost office of the WTC - since the rightmost wingtip appears to have hit nowhere near that spot? (see 3:04 )

[Grommo]

@simonshack ‪2 C10H22 + 31 O2 ->20 CO2 + 22 H20‬

In other words, simply the fact that fuel is combusting means that there is a large increase in gas volume and thus pressure inside the building, PLUS the thermal expansion of gas already inside the building from the compression heat of the kinetic impact.

The concrete dust, smoke and flames rushed out any available exits.

[simonshack]

@Grommo

Nice formula : "2 C10H22 + 31 O2 ->20 CO2 + 22 H20‬"

You must be a trained physicist. How impressive, Grommo!

So is that the case also for the fireball seen at 1:40 ?

And for the smoke exiting the top floors at 1:45?

Before you dish out another set of formulae - please respond using plain common sense - easily understandable by the man on the street. Do you think the exploding jet fuel could do what we can see in this video?

[cartoonplanes]

@Exocet777 if you threw an orange at a brick wall you'd probably expect it to appear out of the other side with its peel still on and then you'd more than likely hang around waiting for the wall to fall down.

turn off your television,put your coloring books away and go and watch the original crash footage.

[Tapper7765]

Y don't u's tell us da twins weren't & no one mass murdere

[Grommo]

@Chidanandaji

I think part of people's resistance to the idea that outsiders would want to attack America is many American's perception of their country as fantastic and admirable.

To I think a vast percentage of people of foreign nations there is enormous contempt towards America with the perception as a selfish greedy hoarding interfering country that spreads corrupt moral values and encourages tyranny and is totally hypocritical to its claim of high moral ground.

[Grommo]

@Chidanandaji

Additionally, if you read the SSSF pilots comments and those on any other forums you will see that the Autopilot navigational waypoint system of the planes can be altered and the plane automatically fly the appropriate path towards NY.

They then may have changed to manual control so as to fly at maximum speed and overide the autopilot's tendency to automatically avoid low altitude and VNE speeds

[Grommo]

@Chidanandaji

So my point is that it's technically possible at enormous expense but somehow such an expensively modified plane had to be snuck into an airport and filled with passengers etc

Far easier to use cheap psyops and brainwash already fanatical anti-american religious extremists to do the dirty work!

I've narrowly avoided machine gun attacks and bombing of tourists in Egypt.

There are plenty of motivated fanatics to choose from

[Grommo]

@Chidanandaji

Well a remote guidance system is a major undertaking to engineer. I know, I've made full size RC road trains (Trucks) for feature films.

During ww2 it was easy to have brainwashed japanese men in unstable planes divebomb moving narrow ships that were firing back at them and other planes trying to shoot them down and still get a good hit percentage.

These building weren't moving nor firing back

[Grommo]

@Chidanandaji

My pleasure Bill.

Have a read through the archived DR KARL SSSF science forum threads where pilots like Bill Sherwood, Martin Smith etc describe how easy it is to fly those paths and also hit the pentagon easily. Planes are really not hard to fly when airborne. The things that make a person not pass flight training are things like takeoffs, landing etc where you are juggling approach angles and slow stall speed .If you are not trying to fly a plane slowly then it's easy

[Grommo]

@simonshack

""2 C10H22 + 31 O2 ->20 CO2 + 22 H20‬"

You must be a trained physicist."

Anyone who completes secondary school science can produce those equations.

Although I do have a university level science and engineering degree, such basic chemistry is learnt in first year chemistry class at any high school and so is extremely familiar to most people of 15 years old anywhere in the world.

It is very low level BASIC chemistry.