FUELLESS HEATER NO FUEL NO GAS NO WOOD NO GREEN HOUSE GASES
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (3,609)
-
@OtherPlanetsSkate Even more so yet if you factor in energy running the pump pushing in the water.
-
Here could be the reason they're measuring over 100%.
SO, More energy coming out as steam, than Electrical Energy put into the Motor.
But there is one more energy input they seem to be neglecting.
Energy of the water going in, which I imagine could be substantial if the water is already lukewarm.
-
There are ways of generating electricity with magnets
-
It would be wise to build a complete test system first. There is no mention of hot water storage (insulated tank) or transfer, and how many times the heater will have to engage during the day to match volumes, and that is not a small motor turning that shaft it's probably drawing 80 amps or more. If the person had setup a wind turbine & gearing to turn the shaft directly then i would be more interested.
-
@2000jago Haha! Well, I'm not the first person to mention it, either. There are other mentions of combining this with steam engines in the comments. But still, with the recent revelation of neutrinos traveling faster than the speed of light in a recent experiment by the scientists at CERN, it wouldn't surprise me if such a thing as perpetual motion and over-unity IS possible.
-
@RoninEnsse I was JUST about to ask exactly the same question.. ;)
-
If this truly generates more energy than what is put in, then why not build upon it and hook it up to a steam engine that can generate enough electricity to keep itself running AND provide the excess to us as a source of electricity? Seeing as it hasn't been done, I assume that this is incorrect, and that it's not over 100% efficient. Then again, the laws of physics have essentially just been shattered recently by the incident at CERN.
-
And western people say that Chinese are the lower educated part of the human beings...... Any Chinese who has graduated from junior high knows ¨The law of conservation of energy¨ that ¨Energy can neither be created nor be destroyed: it can only be transformed from one state to another¨. Yet here they are using youtube to convince I-don´t-know-who that they are 70% more brilliant than Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein.
-
a small electric motor that motor was atleast a 5kw.
if they were getting 150% out they would link it to a steam turbine and never pay an electric bill again. for them to have greater output than input they would have to be making something cold. enthalpy and georotation are the only possible "free" energy concepts because they pull from useless energy.
-
bull crap
Why dont they let it run itself to prove what it's doin
deltaklik 1 month ago 36
you know that if it uses electricity that that becomes the fuel! this is not Fuel-less!
yimig 2 weeks ago 34