Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

FUELLESS HEATER NO FUEL NO GAS NO WOOD NO GREEN HOUSE GASES

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,145,017
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 2, 2006

from the webmaster

Although the device is efficient, in most all water heating applications it is difficult to economically justify a device. The company has moved towards the mixing and reaction chemistry applications and specialized heating applications. The system can heat water, but there are numerous competing technologies that can heat water and make steam that are much less capital intensive and often cheaper to operate, as electricity is an expensive and highly refined fuel when compared to gas, coal or oil. Because of this we ceased marketing home/residential heating systems and generic steam systems. Our core heating applications are now applications where:

A fluid scales rapidly on a heat transfer surface

Safety/operational concerns demand a flameless system for safety
Total automation is needed and not available with conventional technology

Our heating applications are largely niche applications where conventional technology falls short. Examples of heating applications well suited to the device include:

Heating of food products such as cheese, eggs and chocolate
Heating chemical and polymeric streams
Heating industrial brines and heavy salt solutions

Our company continues to strive to bring our customers the best industrial heating, mixing and reactor solutions.

PRODUCT REVIEW

HYDRODYNAMICS.com or http://www.totalsep.com/sprmoreinfo.htm

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Why dont they let it run itself to prove what it's doin

  • you know that if it uses electricity that that becomes the fuel! this is not Fuel-less!

see all

All Comments (3,609)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @OtherPlanetsSkate Even more so yet if you factor in energy running the pump pushing in the water.

  • Here could be the reason they're measuring over 100%.

    SO, More energy coming out as steam, than Electrical Energy put into the Motor.

    But there is one more energy input they seem to be neglecting.

    Energy of the water going in, which I imagine could be substantial if the water is already lukewarm.

  • @yimig

    There are ways of generating electricity with magnets

  • It would be wise to build a complete test system first. There is no mention of hot water storage (insulated tank) or transfer, and how many times the heater will have to engage during the day to match volumes, and that is not a small motor turning that shaft it's probably drawing 80 amps or more. If the person had setup a wind turbine & gearing to turn the shaft directly then i would be more interested.

  • @2000jago Haha! Well, I'm not the first person to mention it, either. There are other mentions of combining this with steam engines in the comments. But still, with the recent revelation of neutrinos traveling faster than the speed of light in a recent experiment by the scientists at CERN, it wouldn't surprise me if such a thing as perpetual motion and over-unity IS possible.

  • @RoninEnsse I was JUST about to ask exactly the same question.. ;)

  • If this truly generates more energy than what is put in, then why not build upon it and hook it up to a steam engine that can generate enough electricity to keep itself running AND provide the excess to us as a source of electricity? Seeing as it hasn't been done, I assume that this is incorrect, and that it's not over 100% efficient. Then again, the laws of physics have essentially just been shattered recently by the incident at CERN.

  • And western people say that Chinese are the lower educated part of the human beings...... Any Chinese who has graduated from junior high knows ¨The law of conservation of energy¨ that ¨Energy can neither be created nor be destroyed: it can only be transformed from one state to another¨. Yet here they are using youtube to convince I-don´t-know-who that they are 70% more brilliant than Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein.

  • a small electric motor that motor was atleast a 5kw.

    if they were getting 150% out they would link it to a steam turbine and never pay an electric bill again. for them to have greater output than input they would have to be making something cold. enthalpy and georotation are the only possible "free" energy concepts because they pull from useless energy.

  • bull crap

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more