I Challenge The Venus Project

Donate: http://www.jacobspinney.com/donate
Blog: http://www.jacobspinney.com/blog
Backup: http://www.youtube.com/otherjacobspinney
Books: http://www.jacobspinney.com/books

The State Is Not Great: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXNRzI64L9Q
Evil Monopolies Are Fairy Tales In Free Markets: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO8ZU7TeKPw

Response To:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKpau1Dx6DQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUbBgkE5v7Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9vRuhTLpFE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf0ZMa2re4Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtEK1-zjdME

My Original Videos On The Venus Project:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FDbZ4mbkC8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6c11sREuEc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLSxITH-1tE

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• jacobspinney
• jacob
• spinney
• venus
• project
• zeitgeist
• movement
• resource
• based
• economy
• central
• computer
• voluntaryism
• economic
• politics
• challenge

[DesecrateConformity]

@thelion2430 "humans need to live by the laws of nature and science is the only way to tell this laws NOT HUMAN OPINIONS" I think that it's kinda hilarious how that is an opinion within itself.

[DesecrateConformity]

@thelion2430 And no, mutualist economics has far more rational backing that your bullshit RBE does. RBE has almost zero intellectual rigor, and, though it doesn't use circular logic, it still reaches bullshit conclusions and is logically invalid, because the reasoning behind it is shabby. It's funny how "your religion is a self rationalizing circular reasoning shit nothing more" (your quote) is circular logic.

[DesecrateConformity]

@thelion2430 that you've only gathered information about from ONE SOURCE. You would be a terrible scientist. :D Lol. Brandy didn't pwn anyone other than herself by conceding indirectly that marginal utility is valid. And no, Brand didn't pwn him at all. She simply made a few assertions, a few claims, and Jacob came back and blew her out of the water. "your religion is a self rationalizing circular reasoning shit nothing more" - what someone says when they know that they can't win.

[DesecrateConformity]

@thelion2430 LOL. I read the science wiki at age 7. Don't go around making bald assertions about your supposed profession even though you don't even know what the fuck that it is. And don't be bashing a subject that you don't know shit about. (Economics). And yea, economics is not natural science, but that doesn't make it invalid as a science. If you knew anything, you would know that economics does use models and hypotheses like natural science does. Don't debate about something

[DesecrateConformity]

@thelion2430 math, and math is what people use to analyze empirical evidence, the very thing that you say economics ignores. You are a fucking fatuous moron. "dude pls dont come to me talking about science i have had long debates with god believers and just stupid people who dont know what science is etc and i explained to them" OOOHHHH I'm so god damned scared of little arrogant swine here that debates with theists. Your arrogance is unmatched by anyone I've ever encountered.

[DesecrateConformity]

@thelion2430 Wow. You obviously have no idea what science is about, you're simply an idiot. Nothing more. The very point of science is to discover, not just to "be right". It's observing phenomenon and testing hypotheses to see if they were rights. Science is tentative, not dogmatic, like you. Economics does this, all of the time. No matter how much you don't want it to, it does. And no, I never said that math exclusively made something science. But economics IS a science that uses

[thelion2430]

@JacobSpinney PLS take your "untrue" word out of your talk the apple example made by you at 21:46 is fucking idiotic .you just took from empty air a price that the water resist etc I poad would cost 200 $ and the normal cost 100$ and then you solve your idiotic example and based on that you claim Brandys point is untrue.where the fuck you know how much would be the longer lasting I poad cost ? maybe it is not 200$ what if it costs 20000$ then somehow Brandys point is valid and your example not

[thelion2430]

@JacobSpinney response to your talk at 20:23...you seem to think that humans can do what ever they want and they should live in a system where what ever stupid wish the person has it should be possible to fulfill it and if a system donest has this option like the ( RBE ) then it must be bad ..i mean do i really need to explain to you why this is stupid and pointless argument made by you ? humans need to live by the laws of nature and science is the only way to tell this laws NOT HUMAN OPINIONS

[thelion2430]

Maybe you go back and look the " [1.2] Response to JacobSpinney - Zeitgeist Moving Forward " and the point made by jacob at 7:09 got totally refuted by Brandy...and this is the huge error in the free market idea...the free market idea is based on the assumption that everybody will play fair and i am sorry this is a naive and dangerous assumption...The free market idea is just a gamble where we cross the fingers and hope that nothing bad can happen...thats why you people are such crazy people :D

[thelion2430]

@DesecrateConformity nice i say your claims are fallacious...the fact is that jacob got pwned the first time by the response from Brandy...You think just because he made a new video and adresses the points again then he is right ...if you would not be biased then you would see how he just makes examples that dont reflect the real life... second he talks about the free market in an embellished way...your religion is a self rationalizing circular reasoning shit nothing more