Survivor Heroes vs Villains And the winner is............

.........Russell Hantz......ROTFL

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• survivor
• heroes
• villains
• hvv
• s20
• all-stars
• return
• revenge
• redemption
• preview
• promo
• amanda
• kimmel
• candice
• woodcock
• colby
• donaldson
• danielle
• dilorenzo
• jerri
• manthey
• parvati
• shallow
• rupert
• boneham
• russell
• hantz
• sandra
• diaz-twine
• jeff
• probst
• Tribal
• Council
• winner
• reunion

[JaCkmArc0]

Did Sandra deserve to win HVV? I´d say yes.

Did Parvati deserve to win HvV? I´d also say yes.

Is Sandra the best player ever? I´d say no.

Is Parv the best player ever? I´d also say no.

Deserving to win a season doesn´t make you the best player ever. But not winning doesn´t mean that you are a bad player either. I

I don´t think there is something like THE best player. There are too many different factors that come to play when you decide something like that.

[emcee2456]

Russell has too big of an ego, that's why he never wins.

[satori03]

Johnny Fairplay was in the audience..and he looked BAD

[JaCkmArc0]

@vicked914 I agree that there is no such thing as a best player. Everybody who won won under different conditions, different people in the jury, different people to play the game with. I just wanted to make my point that statistics don´t mean anything.

Yet if somebody forced me to determine who is the best player I wouldn´t go with Sandra simply because I consider the winners who dominated their game much more worthy than someone who just road coattails and was liked in the end.

[vicked914]

@JaCkmArc0 also your judgment of "sandra can't hold a candle to them" is subjective because in survivor, really strong + strategic does not equal to winner. there's no such thing as "best player"

[vicked914]

@JaCkmArc0 i know i never said she is the best. i said statistically she is the best. but you also cant compare her to other 1-time players/winners because shes never played them before.

[JaCkmArc0]

@vicked914

She isn´t the best just because she won twice. There are alot of players who only played the game once. So if you want to determine who is the best then you need to go by the players first game. And if you compare Sandras Gameplay to the gameplay of some other one time players/winners then you will notice that Sandra can´t hold a candle to them. Statistics don´t prove anything. You are not a Robot so use your brain and not Statistics. I didn´t mean that in an insulting way

[vicked914]

@004Daniel look this show is heavily edited and u have no idea how PARVATI treated the heroes post-merge. maybe she played a terrible social game and never talked to the heroes? maybe sandra garnered heroes votes post-merge? we as viewers will never know but the proven fact is sandra won 6-3-0 and had only ONE vote cast against her in the TWO seasons she had played. anyone who wins deserves the victory because they did something right that the other 2 finalist did not

[vicked914]

@004Daniel sandra would lose if PARVATI wins final immunity over russell because parvati knows sandra is the real threat, not russell. russell wont win regardless of who sits next to him in final tribal council. thats how "good" of a player he is

[vicked914]

@MAriNeMandM you obviously have NO clue what survivor is about. even parvati said in the final episode said that sandra deserves it and if she were in the jury she would vote for sandra to win. you ONLY see like 15 hours of survivor when it is a 39 day (24/7) game with HEAVY edit on Russell who keeps telling you how great he is in his confessionals. who are you to judge who should win and who shouldnt when the jury SAW how these 3 played for the whole duration of the game behind the scenes.

[vicked914]

@JaCkmArc0 statistially, sandra IS the "best" player to date.

[vicked914]

@MAriNeMandM if you think sandra is a coattail rider than you are sadly mistaken. please go bury yourself in a hole. sandra had NO REAL alliance AFTER the merge and was completely disposeable by the villains.