Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Hitchcock interview from 1964 (part 1)

Part 1 of a BBC Television interview with Alfred Hitchcock first shown on "Monitor" (1964). http://www.hitchcockwiki.co...  
 
Customize

More From: davepattern

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
272 ratings
Sign in to rate
59,189 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (138)   Options

Loading...
Luka1990Croat (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That's just what Tarantino does - showing less violence than what actually occurs in the film, panning away from it, but allowing that tension, that atmosphere of brutal violence that makes people think they've actually seen the act.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
THOUSANDAlRE (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@darkprose, don't forget Elia Kazan
TheSunmanho (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
how disgustingly ugly AlfredHitchcock was! sure, he was a genius, but his face looks like a monster.
adamhunterprice (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I like how he just answers the question, he doesnt't dance around anything, the answer is how he sees it and he has no problem saying it.
GEVMM (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Sign my petition to stop Universal Pictures form remaking The Birds!
The link is on my profile.
Dynamitrios (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
What a great guy and a versed speaker too.
redcollargedeon (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Brilliant. The master speaks.

Where are the Hitchcocks of our times?
livingElvis (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
There are none and there will never be, unfortunately. The audiences today expect the crap we use to see and not the commitment to the story in itself. Can you imagine if Norman Bates could take a 100 feet leap or whatever? That would be as crappy and innacurate as the 2000's "Hulk" leaps... lol
redcollargedeon (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The audience takes what's offered, doesn't it?

I heard that Hitchcock walked about with a laminated newspaper article at all times.

It was a murder report that happened after the guy watched a movie with his girlfriend..

The Movie was Snow White.

Do movies influence us, do Directors have a responsability?

Of course not. It's bullshit.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.