Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss
This video is unlisted. Only those with the link can see it. Learn more

RE: I pity the fool4alifetime! Coughlan's head part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,476
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Feb 14, 2009

Exposing the hypocrisy and contradictions in coughlan666's video against fool4alifetime.

We do not hate homosexuals, as people, we JUST disagree with their lifestyle.

Learn the difference between hate and disagreement!

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Krazie316)

  • There is nothing wrong with having an opinion that homosexuality is wrong (even though it isn't). You can think anything you want, but to force your beliefs and attitudes onto others would be wrong. Trying to stop homosexuals from being together or having sex would be wrong.

  • Nobody cares about stopping them from being together so where are you coming from.

see all

All Comments (122)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • krazie makes some very good points. gay people say they want to be left alone to do as they please. but now they are trying to convince it is ok to be gay and it is natural. sex can only be done perfectly for pleasure and reproduction by 1 man and 1 woman.

  • WRONG!!!!!!!

    the blacks did not get equal quality water or facilities, homosexuals however get equal rights and facilities. another fail.

    It IS a sin to be a homosexual and it's nothing that's innate.

    You're really boring me with this tired argument that has been argued well before your arrival and several times might I add.

    There's nothing new in your argument whatsoever

  • The failure in your comment is asserting God approved of this action and asserting it was an act of good.

    David had a womans' husband killed it does not mean it was legal or of God.

    Thus you fail

  • Did the "spirit of the Lord" inspire Jephthah's vow?

    Did Jephthah make the vow knowing a human might be involved?

    Did Jephthah actually sacrifice his daughter?

    The fact that the vow is reported separately indicates that it was not something done under the Spirit of the Lord at all.

    Literal "burnt offerings" HAD TO BE male (Lev 22.18-19). Jephthah's daughter obviously wasn't.

    Burnt offerings were ALWAYS associated with condemnation/evil--not thanksgiving and vows.

  • ...Saying a "ban on same sex marriage doesnt infringe upon homosexuals liberties because they have their unions" is EXACTLY like saying "a ban on segregated water-fountains doesn't infringe upon blacks because they still have their puddles". Even if their happy with second-rate rights, everyone deserves equality.

    Its not a sin to be a homosexual any more than its a sin to be Mexican.

  • I was referring to the discrepancy between what is right and what is legal. It isn't legal everywhere, but it is right (imo) that two people who love each other should be allowed to marry - despite what other people think.

    Sacrificing children HAS been legal well before there was a ban on it - Jephthah killed his daughter for the glory of Yahweh (Judges 11). At some point you have to derive your morality from your own compassion rather than simply what is "written".

  • YOU said homosexuals have as many rights as interracial couples to, there is no ban on interracial couples, look at your comment again.

    interracial marriage HAS been legal well before there was ever a ban on it. Moses married a black woman.

    the pursuit of happiness does not mean doing whatever you want, neither does a ban on same sex marriage infringe upon homosexuals liberties because they have their unions, if they want rights for hospitals and tax breaks they'll fight to include them

  • Once upon a time, not drinking from your race-specific water fountain was illegal. Do you get the similarity? Are you really saying "because its was once legal, segregation / slavery was therefore once A-ok?"

    Interracial marriage hasn't always been legal either. You can choose to hold on to laws that compromise the pursuit of happiness. But if it doesn't infringe on the liberty on others, you really should try questioning your own discomfort and prejudice rather than other people's well-being.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more