FranksVoice has given permission to mirror his videos. Thanks Frank!
Commenting is encouraged on all videos in the archive. Disclaimer: FundieVideoHell does not support the opinions shown in its archives. All videos are uploaded for archival purposes.
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke or an ocean of spacetime - big bang though is tested and you know vacuum fluctuations cannot occur when space itself was not present. It is no explosion at all on a pre - existing space RATHER the expansion of space itself. The other options are string models which are the ones done in paper and in/math, but does not necessarlly happen in reality.
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke (or, perhaps the singularity isn't eternal but popped out of nothingness by some process like energy-time heisenberg uncertainty principle)
@spiritring Paul Davies? cool I read his books as a teenager. He just described that we cant predict beyond the big bang. The singularity may have been eternal, or the density may not go all the way to a singularity before spawning of some hyperspace multiverse, like a bubble inflating off a foam of universes, or an ocean of spacetime. there are many other options, we just don't know how to test them yet.
For this reason most cosmologists think of the initial singularity as the beginning of the universe. On this view the big bang represents the creation event; the creation not only of all the matter and energy in the universe, but also of spacetime itself." ~ P. C. W. Davies.
Are you saying, the universe is eternal in by means of singularity?
@mcmadbat3 "The other 3 forces are explained by the standard model and not by einstein." Did I say it support it? Does Einstein have nothing to do with the big bang? "If we extrapolate this prediction to its extreme, we reach a point when all distances in the universe have shrunk to zero. An initial cosmological singularity therefore forms a past temporal extremity to the universe. We cannot continue physical reasoning, or even the concept of spacetime, through such an extremity. conti ~
@spiritring Again relativity only deals with macroscopic physics and only explains one of the fundamental forces. The other 3 forces are explained by the standard model and not by einstein. It so happens that a singularity is in the realms of quantum physics and not relativity. I don't think you're in the position to challenge the big bang model if you make such fundamental errors.
Why does everybody that believes in evolution is a complete retard?
Lovedesructo69 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke or an ocean of spacetime - big bang though is tested and you know vacuum fluctuations cannot occur when space itself was not present. It is no explosion at all on a pre - existing space RATHER the expansion of space itself. The other options are string models which are the ones done in paper and in/math, but does not necessarlly happen in reality.
spiritring 3 months ago
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke (or, perhaps the singularity isn't eternal but popped out of nothingness by some process like energy-time heisenberg uncertainty principle)
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 3 months ago
@spiritring Paul Davies? cool I read his books as a teenager. He just described that we cant predict beyond the big bang. The singularity may have been eternal, or the density may not go all the way to a singularity before spawning of some hyperspace multiverse, like a bubble inflating off a foam of universes, or an ocean of spacetime. there are many other options, we just don't know how to test them yet.
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 3 months ago
For this reason most cosmologists think of the initial singularity as the beginning of the universe. On this view the big bang represents the creation event; the creation not only of all the matter and energy in the universe, but also of spacetime itself." ~ P. C. W. Davies.
Are you saying, the universe is eternal in by means of singularity?
spiritring 4 months ago
@mcmadbat3 "The other 3 forces are explained by the standard model and not by einstein." Did I say it support it? Does Einstein have nothing to do with the big bang? "If we extrapolate this prediction to its extreme, we reach a point when all distances in the universe have shrunk to zero. An initial cosmological singularity therefore forms a past temporal extremity to the universe. We cannot continue physical reasoning, or even the concept of spacetime, through such an extremity. conti ~
spiritring 4 months ago
@spiritring Again relativity only deals with macroscopic physics and only explains one of the fundamental forces. The other 3 forces are explained by the standard model and not by einstein. It so happens that a singularity is in the realms of quantum physics and not relativity. I don't think you're in the position to challenge the big bang model if you make such fundamental errors.
mcmadbat3 4 months ago
fail argument man
mcmadbat3 1 year ago
wow fail
mcmadbat3 1 year ago
facepalm...
ronnystoehr 1 year ago