Great Global Warming Swindle ABC Debates Part 8/9
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (71)
-
best part at 4:20 :)
look up julian huxley, eugenics, WWF, club of rome
-
listen you self appointed human hating wimwam! hahhaah. no one is asking you to find us a way into the future. listen to that rothschild minion audition for kissingers position when he croaks. hahahhaha
-
LISTEN TO THEM SCOFF AT THE GUY WHO MAKES SENSE. SCOFF SCOFF SCOFF......TO THE YACHT CLUB LOVEE.
-
Eugenic is not bad at all but we must but it in a fair way !
-
On 8:11 onwards: We will soon have not just physical economics but also social chemistry. I’m sorry but some of the audience participation is just woefully poor. Democracy, I'm afraid, does not apply to everything. There is such a thing as expert knowledge and not all opinions are worth expending time on. A good example is the crackpot claim that the green movement was founded by eugenicists and "will destroy Africa". Climate change is not the only indication that all is not well!
-
@topographicoceans11 So I'm the conspiracy nut for believing that the Earth WON'T turn into some kind of barren wasteland which would barely support life. I'm sorry but saying we're responsible for the warming of our planet (which by the way I'm still waiting for since we've had several very cold winters and non existant summers here in England recently) is ridiculous. If you think CO2 is responsible then your ignoring 70% of what our planet's surface is made of. Water is the greenhouse king
-
This debate is a JOKE. I can't believe I watched it.
-
The "mankind's activities are the primary cause of climate change" crowd is wrong.
-
omg, those were some awful, awful questions.
The environmentalist movement and the scientific community are not the same thing.
rileannas 2 years ago 12
Good questions by the woman at 4:20, and the man at around 9:45.
Just watch the mindless laughter of the ignorant masses as the guy at 9:45 states the obvious yet "unspeakable truth".
Even the question concerning the validity of the scientific method posed at around 8:25 was brushed off as being too esoteric or complex for the nature of the program, when it's the validity of the science itself which is the foundation of both sides of the argument!
occultfuel 4 years ago 7