Apollo Landings Debunking the "Superlight" contention

Yes, those corrupt assholes will say any old crap to sell their books and films.

My ongoing Blog:-
http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/

A great video demonstrating various light sources and their effects:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ONk27fN5rg

Source for Lunar Rover traverse:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OVh0gm5vtc

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• apollo
• moon landings
• david percy
• jack white
• whatever happened on the moon
• apollo hoax
• superlight
• fake apollo
• moon hoax
• apollo footage
• apollo debunks
• debunking
• moon
• cosmored
• moron

[zetje01]

The maker of this clip does not show any understanding of why a large sun in the vizor looks so suspicious. This movie debunks nothing, It only show that believers and non-believers can both be not too bright, sometimes.

I think Apollo did put man on the moon, but I also don't understand the big sun reflection in the round helmet. But I seen them on astronauts in low orbit during space walk as well. So I cannot consider them proof of a landing hoax.

Maybe it is caused by scratches indeed!

[Betamax101]

@zetje01 You appear to have missed the point. The contention is that the "large" light is caused by a superlight, hence its size. Showing that the Sun does this on Earth with any number of surfaces demonstrates that claim to be false.

[zetje01]

@Betamax101 Sorry Betamax101, you have missed the point.

The point is that on a fishbowl-size helmet, the reflection of the sun should be very small, almost pinpoint like. (the smaller the helmet, the smaller the sun should appear) If you can't see that, maybe make a drawing of it.

And since there is footage with a large sun reflection on the visor, some hoaxers conclude there were large lights used. I can't blame them.

[Betamax101]

@zetje01 Huh? I am missing a point that you incorrectly assert? Why would the Sun be very small on a surface that diffuses, internally reflects with a camera that would also be spilling such bright light? You make no sense, since I have demonstrated on curved surfaces on Earth this exact thing. You simply don't get pinpoint light on a curved surface when it has such intensity.

watch?v=aBVjjPzU8SQ - That shows what happens to the light when it doesn't scatter on the visor.

[Betamax101]

@zetje01 "And since there is footage with a large sun reflection on the visor, some hoaxers conclude there were large lights used. I can't blame them."

Yeah? Well watch that video in my last message. I completely nail that contention.

[Planetar17]

Just watched this again. Still brilliant.

[Betamax101]

@Planetar17 Thank you kindly. I like this one better, as it totally nails the whole lighting issue stone dead:-

watch?v=aBVjjPzU8SQ

[zetje01]

@Betamax101 Hey Betamax101,

That second clip is a good one; it really shows that that big reflection still is just the sun. Good proof to debunk the superlight theory. You convinced me now :)

[Betamax101]

@MickeyMouseApollo "No amount of bullshit can turn the moon hoax into a real moon exploration."

Correction:-

No amount of bullshit can turn the moon landings into a hoax.

[Betamax101]

@MickeyMouseApollo You have no explanation for this do you? All I see from idiots like you is armwaving crap. The superlight is a big pile of BS and without a means to light such vast areas of open lanscape, we are left with the obvious - it is the Sun.

Your ignorance of everything to do with Apollo, space travel and the technology involved is what allows your limited intelligence the ability to entertain a hoax.