25 Million Pounds is a 1996 British documentary film by filmmaker Adam Curtis. It details the collapse of Barings Bank in the mid-1990s due to the machinations of Nick Leeson, who lost £827 million ($1.3 billion) primarily by speculating on futures contracts.
The film describes Barings as one of the oldest and most prestigious merchant banks in Britain, run by the same family for decades with extensive ties to Britain's elites. However, the Bank harboured a terrible secret. In the late 19th century Barings almost went bankrupt after investing heavily in South American bonds, including backing the construction of a sewer system in Buenos Aires. The bank was saved by The Bank of England, but Edward Baring, the head of the bank, was financially ruined and never recovered.
Leeson, the film suggests, had an "amazing ability to manipulate and deceive those around him" but also points out that Barings "willingly entered into a dream he wove, lured by the prospect of vast sums of money". Leeson, interviewed in jail, argues that he was only able to perpetrate such a massive fraud because many of the senior executives at Barings had no idea how the modern system of finance, which emerged in the 1980s, really worked.
The film details the fates of many of the people who were involved in the scandal, including Peter Baring who "has promised never to work in the City of London again." Hong Kong merchant banker Steven Clarke observes the class-based humour of the downfall of Barings: "For a boy from Watford to bring a grand firm down, I mean it was a social insult as well. It wasn't even one of their own kind."
Above quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/25_Million_Pounds
@vunak2000 lol
jamesarongray 1 week ago
@CookaChicken there was a decent movie about this starring Ewan Mcgregor called rogue trader
vunak2000 1 week ago
@jamesarongray buwahahahhahahahahhahahah
vunak2000 1 week ago
looks like they didn't have their right bearings.
jamesarongray 1 month ago
Norris obviously covering for his incompetence, no incentive for Leeson to lie about the lack of internal regulation, his reputation already destroyed. What this suggests to me is systemic failures, meaning Leeson unlikely to be a one off.
1davidcampbell 1 month ago
@CookaChicken Should HAVE been, not OF
blondecat666 4 months ago
OMG this guy made the devil look good!
CookaChicken 5 months ago
it should of been four 8's
CookaChicken 5 months ago
five 8's mount up to 40 , 4 is an unlucky number in Asia!
CookaChicken 5 months ago
FUCKING AY! love it
CookaChicken 5 months ago