My shrill reply to an attempt at shifting the burden of proof onto skeptics

This is a reply to:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9jUaEC0rlk

The first three seconds of audio is from "Kolchak: The Night Stalker."

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• hho
• water
• car
• challenge
• water4gas
• fuel
• gas
• bubbler
• ebay
• MAP
• sensor
• MAF
• mpg
• miles
• per
• gallon
• increase
• decrease
• BB
• gasoline
• hydro
• assist
• cell
• HAFC
• dennis
• lee
• scam
• fraud
• NBC
• Dateline
• smack
• Booster
• hydroxy
• hydrogen
• dry
• electrolysis
• pulse
• width
• modulator
• HHO
• oxyhydrogen
• EletrikRide
• desertphile
• epa
• science
• test

[Dan221075]

We have been traveling around the USA for six months in a 29ft RV. I have tested my MPG before HHO and consistently got 8.0mpg which is shocking but apparently normal for a Ford 7.2litre V8 engine. After I built a crude 16 plate HHO system and installed it. I immediately got 8.6mpg. I increased the amps until i was at maximum before meltdown or boiling. I now enjoy around 9.0MPG and have saved more than $1000 in fuel in 25000 miles. 10-15% savings is still better than none.

[Desertphile]

@Dan221075 ; No. These devices waste fuel. Take my challenge.

[Dan221075]

@Desertphile It so easy for you to say it doesn't work. There are plenty of other skeptics out there that clam it doesn't work on the basis of hearsay, you are obviously one of them. You have no proof that it doesn't work and i feel that you like wasting your time trying to discredit something you don't understand. Now, in saying this, i don't have proof on paper. Even if i did you still wouldn't believe the results.

[Desertphile]

@Dan221075 ; You have it backwards, you silly goose. It is not the job of skeptics to DISPROVE something; it is *YOUR* job to disprove your own claims. After you try that and fail, then it is your job to produce evidence for your claims. Do these two things first, then get back to me.

[Dan221075]

@Desertphile I feel that most people wouldn't bother taking your challenge because they have nothing to gain from it. Time is better spent improving the system you have then convincing someone that will never believe even if it was thrown in their face. I'm enjoying a $20-25 saving on each full tank of full. At almost $200 per tank, i am happy to save anything.

[Dan221075]

I'm telling you, this thing works. The same results are repeated with and without the HHO. After 20000 miles i and not a skeptic. I urge everyone to built a cheap unit and try for yourself. This is the only way you will believe that it works. Don't pay for a pre built unit, make it yourself. At the end of the day we are trying to save money through increased miles. Once you see results then save for or make a good unit. Keep the other one in the car while you do this to so you can keep saving.

[Dan221075]

continued :> So my question is. Why do you ask for proof when we all know you wont believe the results anyway? Why don't you get off your ass and built a HHO device and prove to everyone else that it does work with your own figures. It easy to press record on any video camera to belch a bunch of hot pointless gas. Lets see you disprove HHO. I know for one that i am reaping the rewards of doing, not saying.

[Dan221075]

continued:> I was once like you and didn't believe it could possibly work. HHO looks bad on calculation and a waist of energy. For me it was a 50/50 chance of it working. In order to prove to myself that it was either a fuel saver or a waste of time/money, I built a unit myself for as cheap as i could and ran it in my RV. After blowing up the first container from hot connections, i tried again. I had instant results and have never looked back. My fuel economy jumped 8% then to 10-12%.

[xtaxplayer]

Patent infringement and as Tesla and Meyers, just to name a few, have found the Patent office screws with your patent to make it almost impossible to understand.

[eveilslayer]

to many people set and bitch about WHY CANNT IT PRODUCE OVERUNITY, Boo fucking whoooooo, its a proven fact that overunity is impossible by current means of technology and the laws of physics, BUT HYDROGEN is 10x more combustable then gasoline, it would dramatically improve gas milage if you could find suitable means to store it, because hydrogen has the smallest atom and can leak easily thats more or less the only problem, thats why its kinda dangerous, because it can blow your engine up.