Ezra Levant Q & A - Part 4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,667
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 14, 2009

7. Ezra discusses the conduct of an HRC investigator who has threatened to sue him.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Just watched warman on old david icke documentary "lizards and the jews".

    he appears to be an asshole. and a dork.

    he also seems to have far too much time on his hands - custard pies and baiting racists? Go focus on something productive like losing your virginity richard.

  • It is your human right, to hate..whom ever hates you! This guy, Warman, seems to hate people, he hates their free thinking, I mean, who in his right mind, will go around pretending to be a woman, just to trick someone to talk bad about Jewish people, and then stub them in the back? This isn't human, this is a SNAKE.

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Please clear up something for me. This man Warman, when he wins his HR cases, he is awarded x thousands of dollars in tax free money. Does this money go to the HRC to fund expenses and pay salaries or does that money belong to Warman? Can he take that money and buy a Harley? Gummy Bears? Trip to Disneyland?  Thanks.

  • You know the douchebag he's talking about has seen this video. Free Speech must kill him!

  • Yes I meant I agree with all apart from the Galloway thing. Warman is nothing but a pencil-necked little dipstick trying to justify his own sad existence like the ADL does. As far as George Galloway, I'm assuming that he(Levant) is referring to Viva Palestina when he talks about 'Raising money for terror'. I don't see how taking baby milk, ambulances, medical equipment , clothes etc to Palestine really constitutes 'Aiding terror' .

  • Your statement implied that you were "with him until", which means, you are no longer "with him". Unless you meant that you are with him, except for his position on George Galloway.

    How this is a twist, I do not know.

  • Gwisss - 'So you are not with him on our human right to free speech?'

    You really must have twisted my statement about a lot in your head to reach that conclusion.

  • So you are not with him on our human right to free speech? You must be a George Galloway supporter.

  • I looked a bit closer... Your point?

  • yea,  definitely...

  • I was really with him until he made that idiotic statement about Galloway lol.

  • george galloway raises money for terror??? YEAH. RIGHT. EZRA...try looking a bit closer to home...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more