11-30-11 4 - Indefinite Detention? with Raha Wala - Countdown with Keith Olbermann

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,983
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Nov 30, 2011

11-30-11 4 - Indefinite Detention? with Raha Wala - Countdown with Keith Olbermann

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (MiniRtist)

  • 1:38 Obama Administration Objects?  But yet he signs into law on New Years Eve...

  • @oellerich007 Congress passed it with a veto-proof margin. So if you're angry at anyone, be angry at them. President Obama signed NDAA, but with a signing statement, and serious reservations.

see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @urabusxrw04 and now it IS the worst thing.

  • Why does this have no views? This seems like the worst thing that could ever happen in America.

  • @MeetMyMeatBE It goes further than that, guilt and innocence no longer matter even rhetoricaly.

  • @dalecs47 I dont like those people either but, how could you fail to notice that the vast majority of democratic senators, I mean even Al Franken voted for this!

  • So far (Dec. 13), Keith Olbermann & Judge Andrew Napolitano are only ones who reported NDAA.

    I haven't seen anybody else on 3 major networks (CNN, Fox Clown Channel or "Bend Over" MSNBC) reporting this.

    Keith was the first one who reported Occupy Wall Street since it began.

    His protege, Rachel Maddow of "Bend Over" MSNBC, reported OWS almost 3 weeks after.

    I repect Keith as a REAL journalist.

    This is #1 important news in the US.

    Shame on all the other TV talking heads for ignoring this.

  • @MydirtyRat1 so it says that a us military-leader, doing wrong can not be detained?? like many of the political leaders, which have military post in the gov ;)

  • read SB 1867, section D line section 1032 lines 17-20. it says "The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States."

  • @justjulie37 he's going to so we have hope

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more