First interview with new Lakers head coach Mike Brown

First interview with new Lakers head coach Mike Brown. Credit to ESPN.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• mike
• brown
• los
• angeles
• lakers
• new
• coach
• what
• can
• do
• for
• you

[byaaaaaah101]

he has one big ass mouth

[gmbdeals1]

Good luck Mike! Go Lakers!

[alekesam]

@RaymondvRaymond24 6. Yeah, we are done here. You don't think much of coaching, which if you had just said that in the first place, I wouldn't have even bothered.

[alekesam]

-> pieces combined for one solid unit but there was no breakout all-star on that team. That's what I mean (and saying that Pistons team had little to no talent was wrong, I admit that...I was trying to say that they didn't have a lot of all-stars or a big standout like a MJ/Lebron/Kobe/Shaq/Tim Duncan/etc). And I still say the Lakers gave away that series more than Detroit took it.

[alekesam]

@RaymondvRaymond24 1. Not my point. Shaq wasn't SHAQ.lol. Twilight of his career Shaq is a helluva lot different than Motivated Unstoppable Laker/Miami Shaq. But somehow I think you know this already. 2. I don't know. I surely wasn't saying Phil is overated (and you didn't answer my question about what coach you find favorable). 3. What does that even mean?  4. In reletion to teams that usually make it to the Finals? Yes. They were a good team, meaning all the various->

[RaymondvRaymond24]

@alekesam 5. knicks, heat, okc, lakers one of those teams are goin to win it this year and you know why? no not cuz of there coach. because those teams have the BEST most TALENT basketball players in the world.

6. i think were done here.

[RaymondvRaymond24]

@alekesam 1. are you sayin you would drive in the paint with shaq in there?

2. Phil Jackson learned from Mj and with that he could teach kobe and shaq want he learned. been in the game for 30 years. overrated?

3. idk the Heat made it to the finals didnt they?

4. the 04 pistons were little to no talent? HAHA dont make me laugh

[alekesam]

-->Jamison, Varejo, Williams, West, and even Big Z are all servicable to good players but nothing to really write home about. But besides that, you can have all the talent in the world yet if you're coached by an idiot, you're not going to go very far (read: Del Harris w/ 1995-98 Lakers, Mike Dunleavy with a loaded Portland team in 02), Rick Adelman with the Kings, etc.) Not to mention outside of Larry Brown in 04, what coach has won multiple titles with little to no talent?

[alekesam]

@RaymondvRaymond24 Okay, then give me an example of a coach that's not overrated in your opinion so I have some sort of frame of reference for what you're thinking. Phil Jackson, Greg Popovich, Pat Riley and Rudy Tomjonovich are overated by your logic since all four won multiple championships with stellar talent. I'd argue that compared to Brown, they had it easy. Also, did you really count injured on his way to retirement Shaq as a relevant player on the Cavs?--->

[RaymondvRaymond24]

@alekesam lol james was still gettin use to the nba 03-05 and in 06 was james breakout year, gettin like 25+ so of course there goin to make it in the playoffs with him doin so well and after that the front office just keep adding good players to help james and thats why the cavs did so well. The cavs had some really good players james, shaq, wallace, williams, west, big z, jamison, anderson... list goes on and on. and brown help with some stuff but i think hes just overrated

[alekesam]

--->coaching in general? Not trolling.