Re: Missing link evolution fossil science sky news david attenborough PART 2

Ida is the clearest example of how any fossil can be distorted by Darwinists and DEPICTED AS THE ANCESTOR OF MAN by way of fraud and deception. The furor that has arisen about this fossil is just the latest and freshest example of the rotten foundations of Darwinist propaganda, which we have been describing for a very long time. Darwinists still imagine that they can deceive and mislead people as they please when they engage in intensive speculation about a fossil. The fact is, however, that people are now perfectly well aware of the false methods used to further Darwinist propaganda. They have therefore immediately realized that a perfect fossil lemur depicted as the forerunner of man is just another component of this false propaganda.

Creation vs. Evolution - A Question of Origins
The creation vs. evolution debate is a question of origins. How did we get here? Were we created or did we evolve randomly? Are we the product of purposeful intelligence or are we merely the end result of countless cosmic accidents? Does it even matter?

Evidence for Evolution - The Fossil Record:
Supposed "missing links" between distinct kinds of animals which can be extrapolated as transitions between kinds. For example, Archaeopteryx is thought to be a transition between reptiles and birds. There are no unambiguous transitional fossils. Archaeopteryx was thought to be a transition between reptile and bird because of its teeth and the claws on its wings. The fact is some fossil birds had teeth, and some didn't. Some reptiles have teeth, and some don't. Some mammals have teeth, and some don't. As far as claws on its wings, there are birds living today that have claws on their wings. Nevertheless, they are obviously birds, and no one disputes this. Besides, superficial similarities do not imply genetic relationship. "There is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument. The reason is that statements about ancestry and descent are not applicable in the fossil record." - Colin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History and editor of a prestigious scientific journal. Patterson is a well-known expert having an intimate knowledge of the fossil record. (Reference: Colin Patterson, personal communication. Luther Sunderland, "Darwin's Enigma," 1988, p. 89.)

Evidence for Evolution - Observed Natural Selection
(Survival of the fittest): Darwin's proposed mechanism for evolutionary change is observed in nature. Natural selection serves as a means of conservation, not one of creation. It explains survival of a species, not arrival of a species. Here's an illustration: You work in a car factory. Your job is quality control - make sure the cars work like they are supposed to. You kick the tires and slam the doors, drive the cars around, etc. You identify and remove defects (an arbitrary selection with the same final result as natural selection). How long would it take for this selection process to turn one of those cars into an airplane naturally over time? It won't happen. "Natural selection may have a stabilizing effect, but it does not promote speciation [the arrival of a new species]. It is not a creative force as many people have suggested." (Daniel Brooks "A downward Slope to Greater Diversity," Science, Vol. 217, 24 September 1982, p. 1240.)

Besides, while survival of the fittest is observed in nature, it is not absolute. We also observe survival of the weakest and survival of the luckiest. Every infant is the weakest of a species, and yet obviously, some of them survive or there would be no species at all. Similarly, when a whale swims through a school of fish swallowing 80%, the 20% that survived were not the fittest - they were the luckiest. Somehow "survival of the fittest" has become tautology. Only the fittest survive. How do we determine they were the fittest? Because they survived!

Creation denotes the existence of a divine Creator who has exercised His creative abilities, creating this world and the life-forms we see. Life is the product of intelligent contrivance. Thus, apparent design in biology would constitute evidence for a Designer. It is a self-evident and universally recognized truth: concept and design require an intelligent designer. So, while recognizing design in biology is not based upon religious premise (but upon empirical observation and logic), it certainly has theological implications [1]. Do we find apparent design in biology? Yes. In fact, apparent design pervades the biologic realm [2, 3]. When we apply the general principles of detecting design to living creatures, we find it reasonable to infer the existence of a Creator.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ida
• missing
• link
• evolution
• fossil
• science
• sky
• news
• david
• attenborough

[MunkyDrag0n]

Not a single speck of proof for these claims except poorly-drawn art and poorly-made computer graphics. A mole could see the flaws in this argument.

[wallidjan]

My house is near a high road in London. I wanted to go to central London, but I did not find anything other than pieces of metal and plastic. When my gaze fell onto it, the metal and plastic moved, came together, and created a car. All this happened without the work of an engineer or a worker. I sat in it, drove to central London. If the mind does not accept the existence of a car without engineers or people making it, then how do you say that the universe exists without a creator Allah God

[kenzaonsa]

Dna

[blissoway]

might as well propose the theorey of colonization, god didn't put us here. we're actually a colony from another seed planet. Ha believe that one too!

[wallidjan]

That is He, the All Knower of the unseen and the seen, the All Mighty, the Most Merciful. Who made everything He has created good, and He began the creation of man from clay. (7) Then He made his offspring from semen of dispised water (male and female sexual discharge). Then He fashioned him in due proportion, and breathed into him the soul (created by Allâh for that person), and He gave you hearing (ears), sight (eyes) and hearts. Little is the thanks you give! (Quran Final testament from God)

[Atriviality]

Ah, I see someone's been getting their science from the Discovery Institute (who have never discovered anything, and have never even tested their ideas).

"The Design" in nature comes about through differential reproductive success. We've watched that happen for millennia. All agriculture depends on it, and we've also witnessed it in the wild.

[Tahnz86]

For example: The Design in nature - (It was either unintended and by chance, or was intended and designed specifically) I know which one sounds ludicrous to me..Also Complex and Specified Information (CSI), DNA, Irreducible complexity, Information... are all just a few examples :)

[Atriviality]

For example?

[Tahnz86]

What would prove a god doesnt exist?? Proof that the universe came about by natural processes would make me disbelief in a creator... but that has not been proved... the more they try and get evidence for natural processes the more obvious they can see there is a designer. God bless :)

[FeineMresse]

AMEN BROTHER..

Let´s start a new glorious age for all Muslims!

I´ll go and burn some books about "Evilution" right now !!

I don´t understand that stuff but I am sure nobody has to understand it because Allah is the answer to all our questions.

And after that I will go and burn my cell phone and some cars and planes or even a cursed witch or an unholy jew.

God, Allah or another random God may bless us for our medieval beliefs !

Let´s just pray that there will be some more dark ages ahead!