Dubweiser Golf GTI MK1 turbo 750+BHP
Top Comments
All Comments (97)
-
You'd wana be in sum scooby ta beat tat yolk holy fuck all them hp's in tat lil yolk
-
@lucasscaife Did you then wake up and have your corn flakes?
-
@alfistii1 thats correct!
-
@lucasscaife I think you mean Porsche Boxster, You got vids of your Transporter up?
-
@xraycortina Turbo vs NA while only looking at the displacement is not exactly a fair comparison...
Compressed engines are essentially adding displacement.
-
@xraycortina you dont know jack all m8 i own a VW TRANSPORTER SPORTLINE i ended up buying an audi R8 engine V10 and put it in the boot My van now has 510BHP and makes me laugh when people try to challenge me porsche boxers and then i rev the engine lol their faces
-
@dogodudits obvi german but because it was designed but giorgetto an italian it was the best of both german engineiering with italian styling hope i helped u out
-
@alfistii1 So in other words it Rabbit was penned by a Giorgetto Giugiaro, a contractor, for VW, so how exactly it is Italian car?
-
How many VW owners know the MK1 Golf was an Italian car?
The original Mk1 was penned by Giorgetto Giugiaro in the 1970's for vw.
He left BERTONE to form ITALDESIGN.
-
and the aero is pile of wank considering it'd die going around a corner
For f***s sake:
The point concerns power output relative to engine size.
Your 8 litre engine has 235.3% of the displacement of a 3.4 litre engine but only produces 150% of its BHP.
Therefore, it is less efficient relative to its size.
It would appear that we aren't going to agree on this, so perhaps it would be better to open the debate to public opinion.
Comments please.
xraycortina 3 years ago 19
usermanname:
In response to, and quoting from your comment:
3.4 litres, flat 6, 500 bhp = 0.147 bhp per cc
8 litres, v8, 750 bhp = 0.094 bhp per cc
Thus, by your own statement, the european engine wins. Thus, European engineering beats USA displacement.
xraycortina 3 years ago 14