5 Reasons God Exists

Does science support the belief in God? Where do ethics come from? Who really was Jesus? Kenneth Samples gives 5 rational reasons for believing God exists.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• God
• Jesus
• exists
• Christian
• questions
• answers
• atheism
• religion
• prayer
• evil
• intelligent
• rational

[d3m0n1cRyan]

There is no porn of this so called god so it can´t exist

rule 34 ftw

[ghm107]

If god does exist and he is this great being, then why can't he come to earth and prove his existence? Hopefully some religious people have read this comment and thought about it.

[NuclearNick123]

Wow, comparing science and the bible to go hand in hand? This guy sounds so stupid, people that believe the bible think that the universe is the way because of god. The big bang theory would not even exist without scientist that questioned the word of the bible. And now they claim that the big bang is how god made it. Oh and then how was god made?

[sceptiquele]

Btw: the big bang-theory is a theory, NOT a fact. We couldn't possibly know for sure what actually happend milions of years ago. It's just the most accepted theory, there are good reasons to believe in this theory, but you don't have to recognize it as a fact. Personally I believe in the eternal existence of the universe. Butthe theory that universe came from nothing is more reasonable as the belief that a wizard did it. Because: Where did the wizard came from? From nothing? Same problem again.

[sceptiquele]

The God in the BIBLE? Even if all this nonsense would prove the existence for a (!) god, it doesn't proof the existence of this particular God in the bible (this angry old man, who actually hates us all and don't want us to have gay sex).

[sceptiquele]

"What people perceive as real, true, right, valuable and meaningful is dramatically influenced by their view of whether God is real or not." Ok, he already lost me at this point.

[Robadubify]

The last 2 so called "reasons" aren't even scientific. And the meta-theologician takes things back even further than the theologician and asks "Who created god? or why was god, a seemingly more complex being than the universe there to begin with?"

[1tabligh]

believe that matter, lacking all perception and consciousness, is the source of the wondrous laws of nature?

One of the most destructive and misleading factors in thoughts concerning God is to restrict one's thought to the "logic" of the empirical sciences and to *fail* to recognize the *limits* and boundaries of that "logic".

Is that which is necessary in essence and which is considered the first source of existence matter itself or something else beyond the limits of matter?

[1tabligh]

@RaizeMusic of the world than to attribute creativity to matter which lacks intelligence, thought, consciousness and the power to innovate?

Is it logical to say that belief in God is peculiar to those who know nothing about man's composition and creation, and that, by contrast, a scientist who is aware of the natural laws and factors responsible for man's growth and development, who knows that law and precise calculation preside over all stages of man's existence, is bound to

[1tabligh]

@RaizeMusic A quote illogical as much

___

Belief in the existence of a wise creator is without doubt more logical than faith in the creativity of matter, which has neither perception, consciousness, nor the ability to plan; we cannot attribute to matter all the properties and attributes of intelligence that we see in the world and the ordering will that it displays.

Is it not more logical to posit the existence of intelligence, will and planning in the creation of and ordering

[RaizeMusic]

@1tabligh A quote illogical as much as it is obselete, as science has establishesd that the physical universe is not eternal, but that it began a finite amount of time ago. An atheistic materialism has become, at this point, nothing but a denial of reality - as you cannot deny a cause for that which is temporal i.e. the universe. God is and must be that cause, regardless of who may happen to agree or disagree.