Pure Capitalism is Anarchy (a.k.a Anarcho-Capitalism)

Subscribe to www.YouTube.com/AnCapChase also Like www.facebook.com/RPrevolution.

This video explains how and why true or pure Capitalism cannot coexist with a coercive state.

• Category

  Education

[Earl Bird]

No. Very much not OK. Let us express ideas. Let us make sentences and not just throw words at each other like monkeys throwing shit. your comment is anti-intelectual.

Capitalism is a complicated concept. Unrestricted capitalism is a rather radical concept. We must look at it as academics. As creatures capable of analyzing history.

Any verbal argument that can be summed up in four words is no better than the grunt of a gorilla.

[cigaretessports3k]

capitalism-capital-profit-comp­etition, ok?

[streetcrazykenny]

Not without a central bank. A war would be costly, and they'd go bankrupt. They would settle those disputes in private courts, probably via contracts. Whoever violates the contract or the court's ruling will probably lose a lot of business. Consumers want to do business with stable and ethical businesses.

[marsglorious]

But once you start having insurance companies enforcing property isn't this rather similar to having multiple states with scattered jurisdictions? What if the two insurance companies fight each other in a property dispute, it would be like a civil war?

[streetcrazykenny]

No. In free market anarchy, the enforcement of private property would be done privately as well. Think about insurance companies (albeit in a free market lol), they would enforce, via private security firms, those rights. The acquisition of said property is dealt with contracts, which private courts would recognize.

To EVERY government agency or program, there is a private, peaceful, and prosperous alternative.

[marsglorious]

Isn't anarcho-capitalism a contradiction since capitalism requires a state to enforce property?

[Oz82]

Cooperation does not happen without one of or a mix of two things; individual profit or coercive force. Capitalism and competition encourage individual profit, statism relies on coercive force. In the former there is peace, and in the latter there is conflict, but without either there is no cooperation.

How, in your mind, will a non-competitive anarchy enable cooperation, since it would lack either motive for it?

[ancavalcanti92]

I wouldn't be worried about violent threats, but I would worry about hostile cultures and propaganda. I imagine it would be more difficult to hold those ideals when people from different places and upbringings bring their ways of thinking. How would you stop that kind of information from infiltrating the land with open borders and without consorship?