Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Christopher Hitchens on Charlie Rose 08-May-96 (Part 2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
16,922
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 2, 2007

(Part 2 of 2) A debate between Eric Breindel of "The New York Post" and Christopher Hitchens of "Vanity Fair" over historian David Irving's controversial biography of Nazi-propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels.

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMxleCC5VVg

Please let me know if you like the Christopher Hitchens videos. Thanks!
- BerkeleyGuy

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Eric Breindel is such a cock.

  • Breindel effectively delivers the AIPAC party line. Whatever the truth, when research for an entire historical period is quashed one has to assume that those doing the quashing have something to hide. Poor Breindel, brainy Harvard Law grad, heroin addict and secretly dying of AIDS here. Typical screwed up Rupert Murdoch errand boy.

see all

All Comments (161)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is a "clever" video. =p

  • Holocaust denyers disgust me, but people who want to shut them up disgust me even more.

  • @writersblock26 Yeah...we're glad your not Irving either...

  • Breindel is such a douche liar bag: yeah historians like Hilberg maybe?

  • Irving is more than a necessary historian of the subject. He's one of the not many authors who has a point of view based on documents and archives, other so called conformed historian base their books or views on nohing in the end.

  • Breindel is just a zionist puppet.

  • CH Absolutely unshakeable, not a hint of stress. Breindel was simply out gunned. Freedom of speech is a right that should be defended first or we limit our own freedoms.

  • *shudders* ...that Breindel dude is a creep.

  • It is ridiculous of Hitchens to call Irving a 'necessary Historian of the subject'. Irving is nothing of the kind. He is a fraud, a non-historian, many of whose written claims are fake, and have been exposed as such by bona fide historians like Andrew Roberts. Hitchens' support for Irving has to do with the fact that Irving had the same diseased opinions on Churchill as himself. Hitchens has a moderately good intellect, but sometimes he plays the goat, and is a bigger buffoon than we suspect.

  • Breindel is a wind up toy...

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more