Apollo hoax photos 3, sunlight or spotlight?

More analysis exposing the use of an artificial light source in the Apollo photos

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• moon
• landing
• hoax

[nighthawk397]

Mythbusters aren't always right.

[jdhog215]

1:02, the terrain is sloped downward which would cause the shadow to become elongated. it's not science... it's common sense.

[Betamax101]

@Cosmored "The idea that the shadows would be the same length the next day is wrong unless we know it's the same time of day. "

Hmmm, that is none too bright, since the lunar day is 14 Earth days.

I think I'll take a snapshot of that for my next video for you. I've got quite a few goodies already from your spam history.

[Cosmored]

@Betamax101

You put forth an alternative theory. That doesn't actually debunk the original theory. You've already shown that you're capable of saying things you don't even believe yourself. You said the Chinese spacewalk was real. People can read about it here.

politicalforum (dot) com/moon-landing/190138-apollo­-moon-missions-were-faked-stud­io-5 (dot) html#post4105095

[Betamax101]

@Cosmored "The reflection of the sun in the visors pretty much shows they were in a studio though."

It tells us that Percy is a lying S.O.B.

You disingenuous ass, you ignored the video I presented to you showing this - watch?v=yWyjuCGEODU

[Betamax101]

@Cosmored Ignore this spamming asshole.

tinyurl DOT com/spamnut debunks his whole stupid wall of spam!

See this video series to debunk his stupid jacket crap:-

my_playlists?p=A042F23232F0B1A­F

[occhamite]

@Cosmored yes they certainly can. And I think you'll find that once they see ALL the evidence, it will continue to be the case, as it always has been, that very few will buy into the hoax theory.

Clavius(dot)org

[Cosmored]

@occhamite

People can look at the anomaly of the swinging jacket corner and decide for themselves.

politicalforum (dot) com/moon-landing/190138-apollo­-moon-missions-were-faked-stud­io-2 (dot) html#post4077668

[occhamite]

@Cosmored Thanks for the link, but there is nothing there other than old, worn-out, oft-refuted hoax claims. The "Collins' jacket" argument is a perfect example: A perfectly meaningless comparison is made between different types of “jackets” worn during entirely different types of activity. The fact that the “jacket' in one case rises does not mean the should have in the other. If you want to talk about what (cont'd)